Yep, and because we know Democrats won’t have the stomach for, the next time there’s a Republican VP on Jan 6th, they will use this ruling to announce that the Democratic winner is an insurrectionist and therefore disqualified and the same people sitting on the bench will rule that he’s right.
You might try to critique this joke with a fine-tooth comb, but then you’d just be splitting hairs.
There’s podcasts like Sleep With Me that occupy the same place as white noise.
True, it’s obvious to anyone paying attention that this was always the point, but it is notable whenever we witness yet another death of a euphemism
It looks like ynab does do this now. I remember when it was just software on your computer, but it’s a full cloud app now (complete with $15/month price tag).
I’m on the hunt for a new solution, too. I may try it.
I’m surprised Dems decided to join in ousting him instead of voting present and letting him stay. But I guess watching GOP flail in another month-long speaker election can only help contrast them.
I’ve heard they’re pretty good at long division.
I agree. Guess I should have put a /s on the slogan. But it’s still taking a portion of something that is technically owned by one person or group for the betterment of the community.
Some people see that as theft and so would call it stealing even though there isn’t a law against it. My point is that this question is asked from a particular vantage point and what constitutes theft and the law may be different from one person to another.
I would collect taxes if I held the power of physical violence over a community. All taxation is theft, amiright?
But seriously, stealing is a crime because prevailing thought within the community is that taking something that someone else has a claim on is wrong. If the prevailing thought was that it was not wrong, it wouldn’t be against the law, but we also would call it something else… Like taxation.
Why does this trailer make the game seem like a dating sim with some combat elements?
Only if it’s a club.