• jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      It’s actually a huge feat to kill such a huge company that had so much momentum. Kudos to him. At this point he could make a business out of ruining things. Pay him to endorse a company if you want to tarnish its reputation.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Not the first time I heard that. Met a hardcore Elonstan who defended he’s a genius, and that he was trying to take twitter down to profit off of insurance money.

          • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            Instead of… you know… actually profiting from one of the biggest companies in the world? After you paid it twice its market value?

          • limelight79@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            Insurance money? He thinks that there’s insurance for businesses being run into the ground?

          • RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            Yikes. Yeah no. Best id guess is maybe foreign money hoping to tank a liberal platform… But I’m not married to that conspiracy. It assumes he’s smarter than he seems.

            • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              foreign money hoping to tank a liberal platform.

              Since when was twitter a “liberal platform”?

              The rightwingnuts have been running rampant over there for as long as I can remember.

              • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                Eh, some of them. You weren’t generally banned for “merely” being right wing. But pre-Elon you generally had to toe the line a lot more to avoid being suspended or banned if you were overtly right wing than if you were liberal or left and now it’s the other way around.

                Just like how the blue check started as an “I am a public figure and this account is definitely who I appear to be” mark and that’s it, then it became a mark of who you knew/could bribe at Twitter to move the process along and could be revoked for saying the wrong things on Twitter (for example everyone’s least favorite gay right wing provocateur Milo Yianwhatever had his blue check stripped for saying something too offensive well before he was banned), then post-Elon it became just a subscription service.

                There was also a tendency to quietly artificially reduce visibility for a lot of right wing voices or hashtags. For example, female MRA and member of Honey Badger Radio Hannah Wallen literally got a bunch of her fans to do some pretty elaborate testing of her account at one point after her engagement numbers suddenly and mysteriously dropped and it turned out many of her posts were invisible except to people that followed her that she also followed, even to people specifically looking at her feed.

                Certain right wing hashtags would have numbers that should definitely have them trending but mysteriously weren’t (or would be for just a few minutes and then suddenly vanish despite gaining popularity in the meantime), certain liberal/left hashtags would be trending despite seemingly not having the numbers for it to be organic, that sort of thing. Because Twitter moderation was curating what was and was not “trending”, literally blacklisting certain topics and bumping up others because of the visibility that being trending would afford.

                It was all really, overtly obvious if you watched for it, like how certain accounts would be shadowbanned on Reddit for reasons that were both obvious and not spam-related despite shadowbanning supposedly only being employed as an anti-spam tool, or how certain subs would be allowed to openly ignore certain sitewide rules.

              • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                Twitter was very diverse. You could see just what you wanted to see. My twitter was very liberal and tech oriented. But now everyone left.

                • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  You could see just what you wanted to see.

                  That’s not my experience. I never wanted to see rightwing conspiracy crap, but I wasn’t able to avoid it crowding my feed until I avoided Twitter entirely.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      I wish I had 44 billion dollars to burn.

      I could live comfortably for the rest of my life on 1/10,000th of what Elmo wasted.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The integration was removed as part of the Nintendo Switch’s 18.1.0 update, taking away the ability for users to link their X account with the console, or post in-game screenshots from Super Smash Bros.

    The removal of these features comprised the majority of the 18.1.0 update, which also includes some general stability improvements and ditches support for linking social media accounts via the Switch’s Friend Suggestions feature.

    Nintendo announced these changes last month but didn’t explicitly state the reason for pulling support for X.

    Given Switch users can still share their content to Facebook, it likely has something to do with pricing changes to the X API which now starts at $42,000 a month for enterprise customers.

    Microsoft didn’t mention X’s API update when it removed the ability for Xbox consoles to share game uploads to the service last April, nor did Sony when it followed suit in November for the PS5 and PS4.

    Cost may not be the only factor as Slack said it had also pulled support because the API updates impacted the functionality of its own X integration, but regardless of the reason, console gamers will now have a hard time connecting directly with the platform.


    The original article contains 272 words, the summary contains 199 words. Saved 27%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    They all have ways to send screenshots to the mobile apps if I’m not mistaken and with Twitter jacking up API prices since Elon took over, it makes perfect sense just to discontinue support

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I haven’t used the PlayStation or Xbox ones, but the Switch mobile device media transfer is remarkably awkward to use. The Switch will broadcast an ad hoc SSID which you can connect a device to and then hit a web server hosted by the Switch to get your pictures. As if that wasn’t already kind of awkward lots of phones will fight you on connecting to the SSID because it doesn’t have an internet gateway, so they consider it a bad connection and just automatically switch back to mobile data.

      • MintyAnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        It is classic Nintendo, to have some annoying awkward system for a thing that has been already done well for years.

        I recall being baffled by the Wii friend code system when Xbox live was so clearly better in every way

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      With each company hosting their own mastodon instance! We can bring back console wars with federation/defederation

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 days ago

        Nintendo would be spamming ban hammer, Xbox would be full of spam, and PS would be full of Japanese posts & memes lol

        its perfect.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      They’ll make their own fediverse. With blackjack. And hookers.

      Nintendo: 🙋‍♂️

      Fine, Nintendo, you don’t have to have the hookers.

      Nintendo: 🙋‍♂️

      No, you cannot dress Pikachu up as a prostitute.

      Miyamoto: 🙋‍♂️

      You can do whatever you want.

    • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      PlayStation doesn’t have an X button, it has a Cross button. /j

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          It makes extremists only able to push a single button and particularly combative atheists able to push none. At least Christians can jump I guess.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            Only on playstation. On xbox and most PC controllers they can mostly attack. On switch they do like… the least common main action, or something context sensitive.

        • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          This isn’t a joke I made up on my own, either. That’s legitimately what Sony calls it.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            Honestly I back that decision. They’re all basic shapes, not letters, so cross is the obvious name for it. I started calling it that based on that logic without being told to.

            • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              And Sony originally had the intention of each symbol alluding to a particular action or concept:

              • O is confirm or okay.
              • X is cancel or go back.
              • ☐ is map, menu, or option
              • Δ is heading, recenter, or point of view
              • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                16 days ago

                Interesting, especially that they intended the confirm and back buttons to be nintendo-like but I’ve never seen them used that way.

                • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  They are used precisely that way in most Japanese titles, but for some reason when Playstation games were localized outside of the Japanese market the baffling decision was made to swap the positions of the OK and cancel buttons. So we got X for OK and O for cancel, which totally makes sense…

  • bitchkat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I’m not a gamer or a xitterhead but what would these consoles do with xitter integration.

    • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      For Nintendo, it was the only way to upload your screenshots to the internet if you don’t have a PC or phone with an SD slot. The other consoles have other integration you could use for images (and they all have YouTube for video) so this kinda sucks for Switch owners that have literally no other way of getting their screenshots online.

    • umbraroze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Sharing screenshots and video captures.

      The only place where I tried to use it was on Xbox back when Xbox One first came out, and I didn’t like the way it worked back then, so I didn’t really use it much. It didn’t send the actual media to Twitter, it posted a link to the file, and Xbox screenshots got deleted after 30 days. If I wanted to properly post it so that the media was actually hosted on Twitter, I had to save the full res media anyway.

      (In fact actually saving full resolution Xbox screenshots used to be needlessly difficult. Only much later they added a way to save screenshots to OneDrive, which occasionally worked, and only very recently they decided they don’t bother with the Xbox screenshot hosting at all and auto-upload everything to OneDrive.)

  • c0ber@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    all three? what about soulja boy? as long as he’s still supporting it they’ll be fine