• panicnow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I generally think arstechnica.com does a decent job of being a non-garbage news site. I pay a couple bucks a month for the ad-free RSS feed. This story feels terrible to me. I don’t doubt a law suit has been filed, but I would expect some investigation by the reporter of the extra-ordinary claims of privilege escape the application is claimed to be capable of.

    • explore_broaden@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Given that the headline says that it is a claim in a lawsuit, and the lawsuit is by a state attorney general and not some random nobody, I feel like they are being fairly reasonable.

      • Raploc@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes because AG’s from repub states never ever file frivolous lawsuits that suit their own agenda.

      • panicnow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I would feel that it would be a reasonable if it was my local paper running the story. Arstechnica IS a primarily technical news site—I believe they should have a higher bar—otherwise they are just parroting a report and not providing useful (to me) news.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Temu is designed to make this expansive access undetected, even by sophisticated users,” Griffin’s complaint said. “Once installed, Temu can recompile itself and change properties, including overriding the data privacy settings users believe they have in place.”

    That’s just nuts

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah, it is. It’s such an extraordinary claim.

      One requiring extraordinary evidence that wasn’t provided.

      “It’s doing amazing hacks to access everything and it’s so good at it it’s undetectable!” Right, how convenient.

      • DigDoug@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re bang on the money.

        If even half of what this article is suggesting were true, why wouldn’t Temu use their 1337 hacker skills to steal money outright rather than disguising it as a shopping app?

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t believe his claims without evidence, but having a legit cover for nefarious acts is pretty standard, no?

      • GenitalHurricane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Libmanwe-lib.so is a library file in machine language (compiled). A Google search reveals that it is exclusively mentioned in the context of PDD software—all five search results refer to PDD’s apps. According to this discussion on GitHub, “the malicious code of PDD is protected by two sets of VMPs (manwe, nvwa)”. Libmanwe is the library to use manwe.

        An anonymous user uploaded a decompiled version of libmanwe-lib to GitHub. It reads like it is a list of methods to encrypt, decrypt or shift integer signals, which fits the above description as a VMP for the sake of hiding a program’s purpose.

        In plain words, TEMU’s app employed a PDD proprietary measure to hide malicious code in an opaque bubble within the application’s executables

        • sndrtj@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          So wait, bit-shifting some integers is now considered being malicious? Is that really the defense here? Using that definition just about all software in existence is malicious.

          • fishpen0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Bit shifting is not malicious on its own. Bit shifting to specifically conceal the purpose of your policy violating code from the auditors who audit the apps submitted to the App Store is malicious.

            It’s about why you are doing it and what you are doing with it and not that it’s bit shifting on it’s own.

    • DigDoug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Temu can recompile itself

      I don’t think the author knows what “compile” means when it comes to software.

      • GenitalHurricane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        1. Dynamic compilation using runtime.exec(). A cryptically named function in the source code calls for “package compile”, using runtime.exec(). This means a new program is created by the app itself.—Compiling is the process of creating a computer executable from a human-readable code. The executable created by this function is not visible to security scans before or during installation of the app, or even with elaborate penetration testing. Therefore, TEMU’s app could have passed all the tests for approval into Google’s Play Store, despite having an open door built in for an unbounded use of exploitative methods. The local compilation even allows the software to make use of other data on the device that itself could have been created dynamically and with information from TEMU’s servers.
        • GenitalHurricane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ah yes, delete your original incorrect comment instead of continuing the discussion about how wrong and lazy it was to make, nice.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This is why companies like Apple are at least a tiny bit correct when they go on about app security and limiting code execution. The fact it aligns with their creed of controlling all of the technology they sell makes the whole debate a mess, though. And it does not excuse shitty behavior on their part.

      But damn

      • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The article linked to the analysis and on a quick glance, it seems to be done entirely against the Android variant of the app. This makes sense because if the alleged actions are true, they’d never have gotten on to the App Store for iOS Apple users… or at least as of a couple months ago. Who knows what kind of vulnerability is exposed by Apple only doing limited cursory checks for 3rd party App Stores.

  • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    But if you install the app you get a free Bluetooth speaker!!

    /Joking. Am I the only one who gets that ad constantly whenever I’m using a device that isn’t running ad blocks?

  • TwitchingCheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    How about pass and enforce strong digital privacy protection laws you fucking cowards. When other countries spy on us it’s scary and bad, but for US companies? Best we can do is ban porn and demand backdoors to stop E2EE messaging.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yesterday, I saw a Temu ad for something and I just wanted to open it to read the info and there were so many popups and “spin the wheel for a prize” and “enter your email here” and so on that I gave up and just looked for the info elsewhere. Never clicking on a Temu link again.

    • pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Same, but a year ago.

      Also, Temu has tried to take all the shopping search results from Bing/DDG. So those results are trash now.

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I get their CAPTCHA where I have to slide the puzzle piece over to look at one of their ads. More than half the time I will do this and it will fail saying I didn’t do it right. So yeah temu has become a trash site.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Have any of you actually ever stopped to process what the tagline, “I’m shopping like a billionaire” means?

    I’ve always interpreted it as,

    I’m needlessly buying things that don’t make me happy, but making the purchase without any hesitation, knowing that the purchase price could never financially impact me in any real way. When I purchase the thing, I’ll probably never use it or actually take it out of the box even. It is just empty, hollow. And somewhere inside, I always know that it’s all only possible, because I’m actively exploiting the cheap labor of scores of other people that are made to perpetually suffer in generations of abject poverty to allow for my relative comfort…

    🎶*“I’m shopping like a billionaire!”*🎶

    • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I am disabled and have limited income I don’t have control over increasing or decreasing. I use temu to save a lot of money on essential things that should be cheap but are still overpriced in America. Sponges. Rags. Soaps. Pens. Tools. Home improvement hardware. Plant grow supplies. Gifts for me nieces. The tagline, is just a tagline. Billionaires are not like me and scouring for cheap magic sponges.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      My interpretation of that tagline is that since the prices on Temu are cheap, it means you can shop as if you had a lot of money, without actually spending that much.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The only thing annoying to me about temu is the cheesy popups for “free” gifts and percent-off wheel spinners.

  • cybermass@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I am not even remotely surprised.

    Every day I hear a story about Chinese software being spyware.