• ___@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    No no no, when you’re this conceited, you care more about how your perfect gene pool could ever have spawned such an abomination. Then you use your insecurity to do something you were planning on doing anyway due to taxes to appease your conservative fanboys.

    And I don’t really agree with the law either. I don’t like the government telling children it’s ok to lie to their parents. I can imagine an enthusiastic extremist counsellor convincing a kid their feelings mean they were meant to be the opposite gender when they really weren’t. Parents being clueless until the court protected therapy was already planned. It’s a little dangerous.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      “I don’t like children being safe from abusive parents. Parents should decide what gender their child is despite court-protected therapy.”

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          All parents preventing children from speaking to a therapist about being transgender are abusive, that’s probably why it needs to be court-protected, huh? Regardless of the (utterly fictitious) extremist radical guidance counselor “tricking” the child into (gasp) starting therapy.

          • ___@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            This law isn’t about preventing therapy, therapy is still available. This is about control.

            • barsquid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Parents being clueless until the court protected therapy was already planned. It’s a little dangerous.

              What were the parents going to do about the therapy before it was planned? Did you not read your own thoughts?

    • rekorse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Its not telling kids they can lie to their parents, its saying that schools aren’t required to put kids into dangerous situations arbitrarily. And only in this very specific scenario.

      • ___@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I look at it differently. It’s a step towards the state raising children instead of parents. It takes those specific guardianship rights away and hands them to an arbitrary school employee.

        In the future, when it expands to other social aspects, we’ll have no recourse. Still sounds like an overreach to me. It’s not like parents don’t swing towards conversion therapy in many cases. Just read up on the couple who breast fed their kid on a non-functional nipple and was in the process of transitioning their 5yr old.

    • Applesauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Maybe the parents should have a more active role in their children’s lives. I feel like your argument is a dog whistle and I can’t think of any parent who is involved in their children’s lives who wouldn’t know their child is or wants to transition.

      You want to talk about government control over families, look at what the Supreme Court did with Roe v Wade.