WASHINGTON, Aug 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. Navy on Monday became the third branch of the military to no longer have a Senate-confirmed leader for the first time in history, as a Republican senator continues to block military nominations.

Retiring Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Mike Gilday gave up command on Monday. The Navy, Army and Marine Corps are now all without a confirmed leader.

  • DevCat@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    In one way, this can actually be seen as a good thing for Biden. It is the duty of the Senate to advise and consent. The Senate has effectively abdicated that duty. The job of doing appointments for the military now rests solely in the hands of the executive branch, President Biden.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is this legal theory that refusal to take a vote on something you’re constitutional obligated to do is equivalent to accepting by unanimous consent. Obama wouldn’t test it… unfortunately.

      • WtfEvenIsExistence ✓@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ll assume you aren’t an American (or that you’re joking), but the US has no procedures to “dismiss” a legislative body. The US is a presidential republic with regularly scheduled elections at fixed dates, and there is no such thing as a “Snap Election”.

          • WtfEvenIsExistence ✓@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well, elections can cost a lot of money if it happens too frequently.

            But at least we don’t have to deal with election campaign ads all the time, since election dates are unpredictable.

            • Clocksstriking13@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Some places with things like snap elections also have limits on campaign lengths and how much money can be used in an election.

            • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              us Elections cost lots of money anyways because of superPACs and how long one cycle is (campaigning starts YEARS early).

        • ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am American. I just think we’ve got a fucked up political system and can learn a lot from around the globe. I also support Ranked-choice voting and doing away with the two party system in favor of multiple parties (since there’s a lot of gray areas and less black or white). Once formed the parties can align forming coalitions to determine leadership of the upper and lower houses. While I’m at it, let’s add term limits and age limits to ALL 3 government branches (that’s right SCOTUS, I’m looking at you)

          Finally, I’d also love to see Question Time added to the US structure.

      • MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I sure love it when the President can dissolve legislative branches until he gets the party that he wants.😐

        • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You have a point in that, if that worked, a bad president could just throw insane nominations out and when none of them got confirmed go “oh look, guess you don’t like my nominations, this is my power now.”