To be based in logic you would need evidence, what you’re using is emotion and inference.
Yes, your source also says it’s a fine and potential imprisonment after several violations. Not getting grabbed off the street as you so claim but only have anecdotal evidence of. If you don’t want to fight and won’t be an objector then renounce, move to the border (if you survive that long) and seek asylum literally anyone can do that. You’re confusing being forced to make a very hard choice with not having any choice.
They’re your links! Just look at your comment and read the links you provided one of which includes your grabbed off the street account given by a draft dodger talking about something he heard second hand. None of those accounts are first hand of someone “grabbed off the street”.
Not getting grabbed off the street as you so claim but only have anecdotal evidence of.
Again, I’ve linked evidence, you just choose to ignore it.
If you don’t want to fight and won’t be an objector then renounce, move to the border (if you survive that long) and seek asylum literally anyone can do that.
None of those have firsthand accounts, quote one and prove me wrong.
The use of deprive and lose negate that dipshit argument. Your sources say the state can’t deprive you of citizenship or make you stateless, you can however choose to be stateless.
Not one of those includes talking to an actual person who was grabbed, we’ve already discussed this.
Again that says what the state can’t do, not what you can do.
None of those have firsthand accounts, quote one and prove me wrong
I’m trying to understand what you imagine it like. BBC taking an interview of someone who was grabbed off the street? The chances of it are close to zero because 1) those who are grabbed off the streets are sent to die, not go give interviews 2) it’s not a topic that would be interesting to the western audience, because probanly nobody would be shocked by it and people are going to justify it by “oh well Zelensky needs to do that because he is a good guy fighting bad guys”, just like they do it on lemmy. 3) it is simply not in the interest of media to capture this, because it would go against the west narrative.
You disregard available evidence because you don’t like it, and instead ask for unrealistic.
Your sources say the state can’t deprive you of citizenship or make you stateless, you can however choose to be stateless.
Let me quote the piece of the article that literally says otherwise.
Вихід допускається, якщо
особа набула громадянство іншої держави
або отримала документ, виданий уповноваженими органами іншої держави, про те, що громадянин України набуде її громадянство, якщо вийде з громадянства України.
There’s no evidence for it against so dispite that you’re certain it’s one way and not the other. You’re not willing to give a country that’s being invaded the benefit of a doubt… I see why you fled you’re a sympathizer.
There’s no evidence for it against so dispite that you’re certain it’s one way and not the other.
Evidence for what? I’ve linked evidence to what I was saying, you are ignoring it, again…
You’re not willing to give a country that’s being invaded the benefit of a doubt… I see why you fled you’re a sympathizer.
What benefit of the doubt?? Some of my family is in Ukraine right now, and each day they fear being kidnapped on the street… What benefit of the doubt you are talking about?? How am I a sympathizer for saying I’m afraid for the lives of those close to me?? You’re either incredibly sadistic or what you’re saying doesn’t make sense…
Do you have even a little bit of empathy towards people being mass imprisoned and sent to die in Ukraine?..
To be based in logic you would need evidence, what you’re using is emotion and inference.
Yes, your source also says it’s a fine and potential imprisonment after several violations. Not getting grabbed off the street as you so claim but only have anecdotal evidence of. If you don’t want to fight and won’t be an objector then renounce, move to the border (if you survive that long) and seek asylum literally anyone can do that. You’re confusing being forced to make a very hard choice with not having any choice.
They’re your links! Just look at your comment and read the links you provided one of which includes your grabbed off the street account given by a draft dodger talking about something he heard second hand. None of those accounts are first hand of someone “grabbed off the street”.
No, I’m using evidence, but as you are ignoring it (and even calling hundreds of cases - one case…) - let me link it once again :)
https://uadraftmuseum.ch/ https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/ukraine-urgently-needs-soldiers-but-some-men-are-desperate-not-to-fight/ar-BB1naQUE https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-russia-war-recruitment/32310040.html https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66542065 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/15/bribes-and-hiding-at-home-the-ukrainian-men-trying-to-avoid-conscription
Again, I’ve linked evidence, you just choose to ignore it.
I’ve already told you that it is impossible, and linked evidence, and you’ve ignored it. But once again, let me link it again.
https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/columns/2022/08/17/7363468/
None of those have firsthand accounts, quote one and prove me wrong.
The use of deprive and lose negate that dipshit argument. Your sources say the state can’t deprive you of citizenship or make you stateless, you can however choose to be stateless.
Not one of those includes talking to an actual person who was grabbed, we’ve already discussed this.
Again that says what the state can’t do, not what you can do.
https://uaconsulate.org/obtaining-ukrainian-citizenship/citizenship-withdrawal
I’m trying to understand what you imagine it like. BBC taking an interview of someone who was grabbed off the street? The chances of it are close to zero because 1) those who are grabbed off the streets are sent to die, not go give interviews 2) it’s not a topic that would be interesting to the western audience, because probanly nobody would be shocked by it and people are going to justify it by “oh well Zelensky needs to do that because he is a good guy fighting bad guys”, just like they do it on lemmy. 3) it is simply not in the interest of media to capture this, because it would go against the west narrative.
You disregard available evidence because you don’t like it, and instead ask for unrealistic.
Let me quote the piece of the article that literally says otherwise.
There’s no evidence for it against so dispite that you’re certain it’s one way and not the other. You’re not willing to give a country that’s being invaded the benefit of a doubt… I see why you fled you’re a sympathizer.
Evidence for what? I’ve linked evidence to what I was saying, you are ignoring it, again…
What benefit of the doubt?? Some of my family is in Ukraine right now, and each day they fear being kidnapped on the street… What benefit of the doubt you are talking about?? How am I a sympathizer for saying I’m afraid for the lives of those close to me?? You’re either incredibly sadistic or what you’re saying doesn’t make sense…
Do you have even a little bit of empathy towards people being mass imprisoned and sent to die in Ukraine?..