• HolidayGreed@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    My HiSense Vidaa OS TV shows ads for newer TV’s from their online store.

    Is an Apple TV box a good platform choice to avoid this?

    • Hazzia@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’d probably opt for an external streaming box and simply use the TV as a monitor instead of the whole system (as it was originally)

      • HolidayGreed@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s what I’m planning to do and curious if Apple TV box is a good option. Fire stick is riddled with ads. Not sure about Roku and Apple TV.

        • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Roku is chocked full of ads too, and regularly sets the default for the “Select” button to open those ad sites or apps. Roku used to be great. It has now been completely enshittified.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean, it could be worse. It could not work at all when put behind a pihole. I keep all my Roku devices in their own group and haven’t seen ads on them

        • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          No matter how you feel about Apple in general, Apple TV boxes are really the only way to go these days. Everything else is designed to aggressive sell to you whether you like it or not.

          It’s either that or use something like a Raspberry Pi and settle for websites, which also have a habit of streaming you lower-quality content.

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you have other Apple devices the Apple TV is the best option.

      Plex makes an app for it, and infuse makes a fantastic media server client.

      Also enables all kinds of useful home automation integration, and FaceTime via your television(this is a game changer).

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    do we have ads in computer monitors yet? monitors often have mediocre speakers so people that weren’t going to bring their own sound system have that option

  • daddy32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    “each new connected TV platform user generates around $5 per quarter in data and advertising revenue.”

    Fuck me, this is the amount of money that’s enough motivation for them to ruin my experience and make me angry?

    I guess regular users have much higher tolerance to ads than me, but our home has a strict zero ad policy.

    • Zwiebel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve heard somewhere else that it’s a 50/50 split between the TV sales and ad revenue

      • Landless2029@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Roku is selling televisions at a loss with the intent on injecting ads based on whats on screen including detecting when you pause a show/game and injecting ads

        Patient Pending…

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      A quick check online says that Samsung–which has about 25% of the global market–sold at least 1M OLED televisions and 8.3M QLED televisions in 2023. So, let’s say that they sell 9.5M televisions annually (I’m not sure if the numbers are global or US-only); that’s $190M in pure profit from advertising alone. For a billion-dollar plus corporation, that might seem small, but it’s certainly enough to get them to take notice.

      • ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s just 1 year’s sales. If the TV lasts 5 years it’s raking in 5 times the data. 190M x 5 = 950M/year, and 5 seems conservative.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s even better for them: those $190M are per-year for the lifetime of that TV.

        So if for simplification we said they also sold 9.5M TVs in 2021 and again in 2022, in the year of 2024 the will be making $570M from the TVs they sold in 2021, 2022 and 2023.

        If Samsung TVs are used in average for 10 years, in 2033 they will still be making money from TVs sold in 2024 and all the years in between. If their rate of sales remains 9.5M per year and how much they generate per quarter in data and advertising revenue from those TVs remains $5 (true, all big simplifications), by 2033 they will be making $1.90 BILLIONS from just this in addition to what they make from selling TVs.

        No wonder they’re full in on this monetization of users even whilst making user experience significantly worse - they would need to lose a huge number of sales due to this for it to not be worth it for them.

      • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Samsung is also trying to make its ACR data more valuable for ad targeting, including through a deal signed in December with analytics firm Experian.

        This should add to their profits.

          • PlantJam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Experian has a program where you connect your bank account and they monitor transactions for things that could improve your credit by a couple points. I’m sure they’re not also harvesting the rest of your data to use in their analytics, right?

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              That deserves to be its own headline. Something like “consumer electronics companies now conspiring with credit rating companies to surveil the public even more invasively.”

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That was the sentence that stuck out to me the most in the whole article as well. Incredible how much is lost for so little. I imagine it’s like drug dealers though, maybe $5 for the first seller, then gets chopped up and cut again and sold for less and chopped up again…

      My question is, what are the alternatives? Other than finder older TVs without so much junkware and spyware, Are there open OS ROMs that can be loaded? Cracked firmware or debloated ROMs? I was very into Android’s launch 15 years ago and rode a train of options away from terrible stock ROMs from various OEMs; eventually privacy and simplicity becomes a selling point for OS after companies get through enshittifying it.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        My question is, what are the alternatives? Other than finder older TVs without so much junkware and spyware, Are there open OS ROMs that can be loaded? Cracked firmware or debloated ROMs? I was very into Android’s launch 15 years ago and rode a train of options away from terrible stock ROMs from various OEMs; eventually privacy and simplicity becomes a selling point for OS after companies get through enshittifying it.

        I’d like for us all to stop for a moment and appreciate just how thoroughly and comprehensively fucked up it is that Linux, which is what all these TVs are running and which is supposed to be Free Software (which exists for the express purpose of empowering the user’s right to control his device), has been subverted so goddamn badly!

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            They should, but they won’t. Between Torvalds’ (wrong) opinion and the logistical issues of getting approval from all the other copyright holders, the Linux kernel will remain vulnerable to tivoization in perpetuity.

      • NullPointer@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        “commercial display” is a worth while route to explore. They do cover a wider range of image quality and features, so it does take paying close attention to specifications.

        • yggstyle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Be cautious with the commercial display route. A lot of them come with “management system” software the company is trying to push which can paywall control features or break things on you if they get online for firmware updates.

          In general though they do make good displays: they are typically a lot more expensive (and heavy!)

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If a company could pay $5 a customer for a competitive edge in customer satisfaction over their competitors, they would. Either they are getting way more than that or there is some cartel/monopoly action going on in the market. Maybe they are playing the long game to introduce an ad free model at a premium.

      Still don’t see how nobody is undercutting existing players with ad free, smart tvs.

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Why is basic math.

        In a made up scenario let’s start with a dumb 50"ish TV. That cost them around $100 to build. Add in another $50 for shipping and distribution fees. It’s at the store for $150 cost. If they set the price at $400. There is $250 dollars of profit to share between the store and the manufacturer. The manufactuerer likely gets under $100.

        Now for a smart TV the revenue stream looks different. First their costs only go up by a few dollars for adding the “smart” chips. So let’s say $155 cost. Then they collect revenue from the streaming providers to be supported by their smart TV say $30 per set. Then they collect the $20 per set per year in user data collected. So if they price the smart TV the same as the dumb one they generate $95 from the sale of the set.

        So the profit from a dumb TV is $100 at he point of sale.

        The profit from a smart TV is $225+ in a constant revenue stream over 5 years.

        And this is why we see so much advertising for smart TV’s as being the best thing.

    • Ugurcan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Point is, it’s near impossible to find a dumb tv with good specs. Like LG is producing no-smart version of LG C3 (best display ever so far), but it’s only sold to businesses.

  • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nah, my TV is not Internet connected. My router is as blocking. My dns is as blocking. My web browser and phone browser are web blocking. I use the YouTube website on my phone. If someone bypasses all that and pushes adds I just back out of that site.

  • Justin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Server to host media. Super easy to set up and can run on a Windows client. Don’t even need an independent server to run it on. https://jellyfin.org/

    https://kodi.tv/ (or https://libreelec.tv/ for an OS that boots to just Kodi)

    Application to watch through Kodi https://github.com/jellyfin/jellycon

    Client to run Kodi on: MeLE PCG02 Mini PC Stick https://a.co/d/1EGnekO

    If you didn’t want to install LibreELEC to the PC and just want to keep Windows, you could run Kodi in Kiosk mode and it would boot directly to it just like LibreELEC.

    I have not watched normal TV in years, let alone an ad on my TV. I spoke to my neighbors one day and figured out they were paying ~$60 a month for all their streaming services, and they’re STILL getting ads…

    Stuff like this is unacceptable, and I refuse to partake in the lunacy and delusion that is modern television.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The number of people suggesting this shit as a replacement for streaming services is way too damn high.

      The monetary cost of the hardware is insane if you want to have any sort of hardware to store your data. But the time investment to get something like this running is 10x more. And at the end of the day it’s all 100% illegal and liable to get you in tons of trouble.

          • golli@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Since he mentions enshittification, I assume he means Plex.

            However I am pretty sure both will have some bugs. I use jellyfin, so I can only speak about that. But one annoyance is that the androidTV app sometimes doesn’t have the best subtitle support. However it allows you to open movies in external players, which is a workaround.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I bought a lifetime plex pass once and have no issues since. HW encoding works out of the box, the scanners do their job and I can use their apps on every platform. I had to disable the Plex offered free movies once, the horror. Don’t act like Plex is some Google level shit of annoyance or ‘enshittification’.

          Jellyfin on the other hand has atrocious UI that basically screams the absence of any sort of UI designer into your face, the HW encoding is a mess to set up and the apps are a jungle of different 3rd party apps…

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I never said Plex is google-level enshittification, don’t project words in my mouth. What is a fact though is that it is undergoing enshittification and that it’s a buggy mess and video transcoding might work for you, but it’s a well known source of pain for others. It could be better on Jellyfin too, but nowhere near as difficult to set up, even on weird/unsupported systems.

            UI screams no designer

            Idk what you’re on about, not even LTT Linus pointed out any issues with the UI and he is no Linux CLI wizard.

            If anything it’s far simpler to use than Plex because it doesn’t have the dark pattern bullshit into it.

            You load the app, you hit movies or TV shows, hit your favourite movie or TV show and play. It’s not complicated at all, no need to click past the various upsells and no need to buy battle passes just to watch a film.

            The only thing this supposed absence of a “UI designer” seems to have brought is the absence of upsells and enshittification/dark patterns.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Don’t act like Plex is some Google level shit of annoyance or ‘enshittification’.

            Close enough for me.

            The UI has always been pretty terrible to navigate but when they started trying to push all their streaming services I jumped ship. I don’t respect companies that don’t respect their customers. Jellyfin is better and is constantly improving where Plex is doing the opposite and wants to charge you for the privilege.

            • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              What streaming services is plex pushing? They offer integration for other services you subscribed to like Netflix or Disney and they also offer free, ad based services that you can permanently hide with one button. And the UI? Jellyfin is so convoluted, especially the settings.

              • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                You answered that yourself.

                Question:

                What streaming services is plex pushing?

                Answer:

                They offer integration for other services you subscribed to like Netflix or Disney and they also offer free, ad based services

                Honestly thought it was just one service, not services, didn’t know it was that bad. Yikes! Commercialisation strikes again.

                Plus, there’s the “Plex pass” as you mentioned. I’m sorry but I’m not buying some bullshit battlepass just to watch movies lol.

                Convoluted

                How are Jellyfin settings convoluted in the slightest? How is the UI convoluted? You keep saying it, but you can’t give a single example so far. Can you mention at least one?

                As for the settings they’re all neatly split by categories and pretty straightforward, not that you have to use the settings much if at all tbh. Outside of “scan library” I don’t think I’ve been in the settings once after setting up the automatic subtitles download plugin.

                Jellyfin is a great example of how FOSSware just works, and doesn’t stop working like the competing capitalist enshittificationware when it decides to rake it in.

  • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Average users will not have the knowledge or patience for work arounds.

    Imo, the larger problem seems to be the majority of users appear to be fine with ads and data collection just to watch a movie or series.

    • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah that’s well put. All this advocacy for adblockers and not accepting the awful state of things fall on deaf ears, most people don’t care, they accept the state of things as it is, and technology as magic.

      • Frozyre@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh man, I’d hate to be the dude twiddling his thumbs on Ad 2 of 8 on Twitch.

        “Dum de dum dum, wonder what the streamer is currently up to. Oh well, another 45 seconds to go. Dum de dum dum”

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Imo, the larger problem seems to be the majority of users appear to be fine with ads and data collection a lax and ineffective regulation.

      “Voting with your wallets” is a false premise dreamed up by corporate to avoid govt regulation and has not and will never be a real thing that works in this world of monopoly and lack of option.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You can either vote with your wallet or do nothing…

        Working people have no way to lobby government, shortage of a revolution, real people make decisions for benefit of other real people.

        NPCs are just here to enrich them both.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You can either vote with your wallet or do nothing

          I don’t want to fight here, we agree. In fact i bet we agree on a lot. But VWYW is, i can not stress this enough, not a thing. If it ever was in our lifetimes, it ain’t now. Its time the phrase was dropped outta everyone’s mouth.

          You can purchase something that thru your effort does not do most of the awful things you are trying to avoid, that’s being a smart customer. It’s not like I’m dismissing the entire idea behind VWYW, just that it is simply that now, it’s an idea that doesn’t work with the facts on the ground.

          The power of our “wallet ballots” gets lower when Monopoly power gets higher. Monopoly power is very high. VWYW power is in this world, in this moment, not a thing.

          My point, is a simple but strident one. VWYW is not voting! It just isn’t.

          It has absolutely no effect on the world around us. Puts no pressure on companies. Is not a thing except in our heads. It is time to let go of the idea.

          And yeah…working people like you and me have no power period. “Voting with your wallet” is now simply a power fantasy pushed by capitalists to keep regulations at bay and held by the powerless clinging to an illusion of agency.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I don’t agree but you can either vote with your wallet or mindlessly consume.

            One is better than the other but yeah 80% of spending is not really discretionary… Gonna need to get a rental, gonna need healthcare, transports education etc

            But you can stop drinking soda for example… It ain’t much but it is something.

            People don’t have to pay subscriptions either…

            • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I … think i understand what you’re saying. You don’t agree with my definition of VWYW? I don’t wanna assume, but i think maybe you define it as reckless vs thoughtful spending?

              Mine has to do with the effectiveness of our purchases in driving market trends. They do not.

              You don’t have to buy a subscription to Netflix, but deciding not to isn’t changing anything for anyone (besides saving you 15 bux).

              • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Is $6 too much for a bag of Ruffles?

                After nearly three years of price increases, signs that buyers have had enough are starting to mount. On Thursday, the food and beverage giant PepsiCo reported a 0.5 percent decline in revenues in the second quarter in its Frito-Lay snack business from year-ago levels, a result of a 4 percent drop in volumes in the category.

                I think maybe we voted with our wallets against $6 chips but you could probably convince me otherwise in a paragraph :)

                • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Well sir I’m always down for a nice discussion, you had me at hello. But youre in trouble if you only wanted a paragraph 🤣

                  Your link is great evidence to your point. It absolutely does reinforce the idea, with evidence that voting with your wallet does indeed affect change. I should say also my point isnt VWYW doesn’t ever work but that it has very little power.

                  I’d like to suggest that same article also helps mine, at least some.

                  Point being it shows VWYW (at the consumer level) didn’t have the power to stop the inflation of chips in the first place. Leaving aside the illusion of choice, the current system has taken the power of VWYW out of our hands almost completely.

                  The fact that PepsiCo even has that kind of market power is beyond question at this point right?

                  I’m not saying anything controversial if i take it further, that supply chains between our bag of chips and Pepsico, (distributors, grocery stores etc) are also consolidated, yeah?

                  At each step of the process, market consolidation reduced the ability of the companies within that chain to VWTW, and they pass the costs on down to the next link who also has no ability to VWTW. At the end of this chain we sit with our wallets, but the power has been diminished before we got to open them. Just like the lesser evil, VWTW becomes a choice of voting between ALL chips that cost more across the board or no chips at all.

                  That’s what i mean when i say VWYW in this system, at this time, is meaningless.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It only works in competition which we don’t have for the most part.

        Instead we have the illusion of choice through multiple brand product names. There’s a couple choices, sure, but few enough to function as an effective monopoly.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re not “fine with ads and data collection” so much as they don’t care and can’t be bothered to look for a better way.

      It’s just apathy and a bit of lazy inertia.

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Not mine. My TV’s my absolute digital bitch. It lets me do anything I want AND nothing, unlike Warren Buffet’s kids

  • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Problem is getting an 55+" Screen with an OLED panel and support for HDR in a non-smart package

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t give your TV the wifi password, kids. No, you don’t need to ‘finish setting up’ your TV; it works just fine as a dumb display.

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Next time I have to get a new TV I think I’ll just get a large computer monitor and stream content via an old mini PC with Linux installed on it. Not an ideal solution, but I’m so tired of this invasive bullshit. At least that will cut out some of its vectors.

      After the recent Roku TOS fiasco I’m done with them. If manufacturers won’t give us a viable situation we will make one ourselves.

      Anyone know a good OS setup for reduced ad streaming? I know about Pi-Holes, but I’m talking about a way of actually streaming content (in addition to blocking ads at our near the router level).

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I use my PS5, TBH. I still get ads on Amazon Prime, but I’m not seeing Netflix ads. (I also don’t have Hulu, etc.) I pay for a VPN for my desktop–I’m using Win 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC–and with Firefox and uBlockOrigin I see pretty minimal ads online; if you’re able to open your streaming service in a browser rather than needing to download their application, then a VPN an uBlockOrigin might be sufficient.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’d have to check and see if I can access Netflix from my desktop at work, but my suspicion is that the lower quality has more to do with smaller screens in general. That is, you can get away with a lower bitrate when you’re viewing on a screen that’s 19", and that’s probably a fairly safe maximum size for most people watching on a desk- or laptop directly.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        A way more than enough Mini PC for streaming content costs about $140 nowadays.

        It’s a direction I went into recently and was pleasently surprised how cheap it all is.

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I pity the poor fool who sets up their smart TV instead of just grabbing an HDMI cable and plugging in their computer.

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That is beyond the capabilities of normies.

      My wife would agree with this:

      Media PC

      And I’ve got Plex running on an always on NAS.

      • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Lmao that greentext was literally me before I finally set up arrstack. One of the best investments of my time, it has definitely paid off over many years of just having things automatically download.

          • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I mean yeah there’s a lot of stuff it does, but you can pick and choose what you want to use it for so it depends on what you would find useful - you don’t have to use the full automation. I started just by using it as a read-only way to see what movies I had and in what qualities and keep things organized. You can use it as a manual interface to do one-off downloads - basically just as an interface to search 5 torrent sites in 1 place where you are still picking exactly what you want it to download. You can use it only to rename files to a consistent format. So there are a lot of ways to use the various features of sonarr/radarr besides automatic downloads. You’re not forced to go all-in and out of the box it doesn’t start automatically downloading until you enable that.

              • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I’m glad to clear it up! It’s a super powerful tool, and I still occasionally skip the automation and just use it for manual searches since it reduces that process to a single click to search all configured torrent sites and a single click to download and have the rest automatically handled.

                Before when I was visiting friends and wanted to quickly add something to plex, I used to need remote access to my torrent client and separate remote access to my NAS filesystem to move/rename files when downloads finish which was a really manual process. Now all I need is the reverse-proxied sonarr/radarr UI since it handles moving/copying/renaming on download completion - and while the UI isn’t mobile-first, it’s very usable and feels less error-prone than moving/renaming files remotely using a file explorer app.

        • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          My Arr’s are unreliable. The trackers they search keep becoming unavailable for some reason. Flaresolver doesn’t seem to work with my VPN setup. Sometimes the file it finds to download turns out to be 54GB for a 1080p movie and I can’t figure out what the hell is going on there either. I haven’t got the time to look into Usenet any time soon. If I try to deploy something and it doesn’t work 100% right off the bat then the “wife acceptance factor” drops to zero, so I’ve got to be damn certain before I start tinkering.

          This comes off the back of a device on my network causing router issues and making Plex unreliable for a couple of weeks. By the time I diagnosed and fixed the issue, the damage was done and wife acceptance factor was lost.

          • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Man that sucks. I must have gotten lucky or something with my setup. I also have trackers go unavailable all the time but I enabled 8 different ones and usually multiple will have the same torrent so it usually has no problem finding something even if 1 or 2 are down. I also don’t VPN tracker searches, just my BitTorrent client so flaresolverr seems to work fine for me (I only have it enabled for 2 of my trackers since most of the ones I use don’t seem to require it).

            If you end up trying it out again I would look into the quality settings and make sure you’re not using the remux quality profile (edit: apparently the default 1080p quality profile has the 1080 remux quality enabled so this might have been the problem). By default most of the quality profiles seem to limit at 100MB/min, so a 2 hr movie shouldn’t allow anything over like 12GB. Whenever I tweak quality or custom formats I refer to trash guides which has a lot of battle-tested rules you can copy. I have my main quality profile set to only download qualities between hdtv720 and br1080 (which is just below remux) with custom formats copied from trash guides set to prefer hevc with surround sound since I have 5.1.

            • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Thanks. Really helps to know where to start looking when I get time over the weekend.

              • TrenchcoatFullOfBats@belfry.rip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                You may also want to look into Usenet instead of torrents when you’re researching. Sonarr/Radarr/Readarr etc all work (in my opinion) better with Usenet.

                You’ll need to pay some, but the reliability is amazing, which is extremely helpful for the partner acceptance factor. I pay for two providers (newsdemon is primary and eweka is a backup) and two indexers (drunkenslug and nzbfinder), and everything has been rock solid reliable for years. Download speeds are also MUCH faster than torrents.

                Combine this setup with overseerr (or jellyseerr) so your partner can find their own things to download and you might be able to get them back on board.

                Plus, no flaresolverr required!

          • Wildly_Utilize@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            My gf loves stremio + torrentio + real debrid I set up for her

            It does go down occasionally and she is more techy and patient than most but give it a try if you havent.

            Its dead simple compared to what you’re doing now and good to have in your back pocket even if you want to maintain a local library. Having an issue? NP just open stremio and everyone’s happy

    • ChillPill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ive been pretty happy so far with roku and blocking stuff with pihole, but every day I am more and more tempted to build a media pc…

      • yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Currently trying that for the same reasons you are tempted. Roku was passable and even a good choice years ago and it’s on a precipitous race to the bottom now.

        Problem for me currently is finding a non windows solution that is navigable from a controller or remote is … tough. Steam, emulation station, Kodi all have reasonable interfaces but there seems to be a gap in a unified launcher solution (as well as a decent ‘app’ for accessing YouTube.) I really don’t want to spin up a single VM for each activity when they all in theory should play nice together.

        • TrenchcoatFullOfBats@belfry.rip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          My solution to this problem is Jellyfin, fed by usenet-backed sonarr/radar and Tubesync to pull in YouTube channel subscriptions. Those are added to a Jellyfin library which is accessible right next to movies and tv shows.

          This is all through the Jellyfin app on a 2019 Nvidia Shield Pro. It’s a perfect couch-friendly setup. For just regular YouTube browsing, SmartTube can be installed on the Shield and on your phone. You can then cast to the SmartTube app on the Shield instead of to the YouTube app.

          • yggstyle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            It seems we have similar backend setups 🏴‍☠️

            I’ll need to dig into an android solution a bit - smarttube seems pretty nice but has no Linux version unfortunately.

        • lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Exactly what I’ve been looking for too, and have come up wanting. I got excited recently about finding KDE Plasma Big Screen, but then it falls at the last hurdle on the app selection.

          • yggstyle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            That gave me abandoned vibes when I looked into it. Maybe they just didn’t update anything on their site but I struggled to find any recent info or reviews on it. A shame honestly. I loved the idea.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        This is the way to go. I tried pihole using Samsung smart features, but if you block so the telemetry eventually your apps stop working and you can’t get them working again without doing a factory reset with blocking down. It’s prohibitively a pain in the ass, taking hours every time YouTube stops working.

        Never had any issues with Roku on pihole.

        • yggstyle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Depends on your blocklist. It would freak out every so often on me when I was preventing it from bypassing my DNS with its hard coded ones until I added in a forced redirect instead.

        • henfredemars@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I believe one reason maybe that the software is so garbage it can’t handle not being able to submit all its logging information when otherwise the system thinks it’s online.

          • MagicShel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            That makes perfect sense and explains why you can’t fix it just by bypassing blocking temporarily and reinstalling the app.

          • yggstyle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            This is the case with Rokus as well. If you also redirect or block the hard coded DNS (Google) from bypassing your local DNS it starts to get extremely sluggish over time… presumably from background processes repeatedly resending requests out.

    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That is my preference, but my wife says she prefers only one step (turning on and using the TV) over multiple (turning on the TV, turning on the secondary system and using multiple controllers) so we go with the simpler setup per her request.

      I did put my TVs on a Wi-Fi network separate from my main one so, while they do show ads as much as my pihole allows, at least they’re theoretically only spying on each other.

      • asap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        With HDMI-CEC you can achieve what your wife wants. I have one remote to turn on my Nvidia Shield (with Plex, Jellyfin, Netflix, etc), and that same remote also controls all TV functions.