silence7@slrpnk.net to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前Chemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkChemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’www.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.net to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前message-square7fedilinkfile-text
In practice, this means 3M is continuing to create harm from the risks they spent decades covering up
minus-squareCocodapuf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 个月前No they can’t. Do you know where fancy spring water brands get their water? The fucking tap, that’s where.
minus-squareP1nkman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 个月前Wrong. The rich uses lab-grown water, clean from all the chemicals!
minus-squareMaeve@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·4 个月前Reverse osmosis, which wastes a lot.
No they can’t. Do you know where fancy spring water brands get their water? The fucking tap, that’s where.
Wrong. The rich uses lab-grown water, clean from all the chemicals!
Reverse osmosis, which wastes a lot.