More than 33,000 unionized Boeing workers went on strike Friday, rejecting what they say were unfair terms of a deal the embattled aerospace company tentatively reached with their union.

The rejected deal tried and failed to win over workers by offering a 25 percent wage increase and promised to build Boeing’s next jet in the Puget Sound region in Washington, which Boeing claimed offered "job security for generations to come.

But after International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) District 751 president Jon Holden urged the union to accept the deal—which Boeing said was the “largest-ever general wage increase” in the company’s history—hundreds of Boeing employees immediately began resisting ahead of a Thursday vote that ultimately doomed the deal.

Instead of agreeing to a deal that compromised the desired 40 percent wage increases and eliminated workers’ annual bonuses, about 96 percent of workers voted to strike, The Washington Post reported. Rather than take what Boeing offered, workers seized rare leverage amid Boeing’s financial and production woes to pursue better terms.

Boeing workers have not walked out since 2008, when a 57-day strike cost Boeing about $1.5 billion, the Post reported. Analysts told Bloomberg that the current strike is estimated to last about 50 days, too, potentially costing Boeing between $3 billion and $3.5 billion.

  • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Anything to keep the workers subjugated… even tanking a bedrock American corporation…

    What a stupid hill to die on.

    Rest in piss, assholes

  • romp_2_door@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Boeing deserves to fail, it’s way past the point of no return of terrible.

    Enough is enough, time for something new

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Boeing board of directors: “Now should we negotiate?… OR… net net—would it in fact be cheaper to deploy, say, 33,000 hitmen? Let’s get accounting on that to crunch the numbers and circle back…”

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good on the workers. But my worry is that Boeing is a sinking ship and this will end up as anti-union propaganda when they (not the doors that fall off mid-flight) are what is blamed for Boeing collapsing.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This is particularly interesting, since modern organizational theory tells us that Boeing’s primary customers would be much better off with a shift in power toward Boeing’s workers, away from it’s current leadership.

    Purchasers of huge airplanes cannot afford to purchase airplanes built under leadership that cuts corners the way Boeing’s leadership lately has.

    The striking workers may have an unusual ally here - in Boeing’s customer base, which notably includes the US Government and parts of it’s Armed Forces.

    • Chocrates@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree with you, but nothing he workers asked for seems to do any of that. Rather it will “balloon” payroll and the c suite will look for ways to make their money. This is all assuming that boeing has been doing what other companies have been, and focusing on stock buybacks and getting money back to shareholders.