• FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is definitely one of the most interesting attacks that’s ever happened. It certainly doesn’t look like an accident. If it was indeed Mossad: take a bow, you’ve earned it. That was a pretty slick move. That was probably a difficult op to pull off. Gotta respect the craft, even if you disagree on the method.

    • craigers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      How exactly did they pull that off? And with walkie-talkies too. There’s no way you can do that with normal RF. The only thing I can figure is they had to intercept the devices and tamper with them in some way.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Its not rocket science how they did it. What is the impressive part? Are we really just going to say civilians don’t matter? Is it impressive to you because of how many people were hurt?

      In no way is it required to respect the craft or the method.

        • machineLearner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          You know not everyone in Hezbollah is a « militant » right? They have a large political party and civilian governance apparatus. This is terrorism, nothing new to Israel.

          • And I’m sure Islamic State and the Taliban have non-combatant elements too.

            I don’t mind Israel defending against militant groups that fire rockets into Israel. I do mind them carpet-bombing civilian populations. This pager-thing seems to have the hallmarks of an operation that manages to cripple Hezbollah with a minimal loss of life and even fairly low civilian casualties. I much prefer Israel do this over the alternatives.

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Well it seems its up to the attacker to decide what is considered valid military targets. Al Qaeda viewed 9/11 as a valid military target.

                  Indiscriminate killing is always bad, no matter how targeted you think it is. In this case it was mass maiming, oh and a few kids died right? That’ll teach em to stop being bad people won’t it!

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            To take this to it’s logical extreme, how do you feel about assassination attempts on high ranking Nazi officials? They’re non combatants, after all.

          • evranch@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Militants specifically use these pagers for security and stealth. Everyone else just uses phones.

            It’s a brilliant way to target only combatants, and also expose them to their friends and neighbours. This attack is incredibly disruptive with very little collateral damage compared to alternatives.

            And yes, it’s terrorism, an attack meant to inspire terror and disrupt communication networks with a chilling effect much larger than the actual damage. However it’s interesting as unlike most terrorism it does not target civilians.

            It’s also terrifying to think we are living in a world where a malicious component attack is a legitimate concern. This is one of those moments that change the world - I’m sure every industry is thinking about the danger of their foreign supply chain right now.