• Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Everyone needs a lesson in how tarrifs work. Tarrifs are a tax on thing that US companies buy. They are intended to make foreign products more expensive to protect domestic producers. So, the American company pays the tariff. They then pass that tariff on to their customer, either another company or an American consumer. Then, the country that the tariff had been applied to applies offsetting tarrifs on American goods.

    When the product that the tariff is applied to can’t be produced in the US, think advanced microchips or Canadian softwood lumber, Americans pay more but still have to buy the foreign product. With the softwood lumber tarrifs the cost of building a home with Canadian softwood lumber went up by tens of thousands of dollars and Canadian companies laughed all the way to the bank. American consumers paid more and Canadian companies made record profits because the US can’t produce enough softwood lumber to meet its needs.

    So, the price to American companies and consumers goes up and the cost of American goods overseas goes up. Americans pay the tarrifs and American companies sell less goods overseas.

    America loses.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      35 minutes ago

      That’s the point of tariffs…to give domestic supply a shot.

      It’s stupid and short-sighted in a modern economy. It’s not worth it for any manufacturer to shut down existing mega factories and build new ones here. They won’t find enough people to do the jobs (especially if we deport/denaturalize a ton of people) and the costs and re-investments are huge.

      Plus the only places that are left to build giant factories are distant from population centers. And I doubt there will be mass transit into them. So more pollution from personal transportation. And more pollution from local factories. Ripping the EPA to shreds will help with that, and that’s a part of agenda 47.

      And you just know the ones that choose to come and build here are gonna get really nice tax breaks to do so, so there won’t be any real return for the community for a long time, if ever.

      The end result is either they pass the costs into consumers, or they cut costs by laying off their expensive state-side employees and moving their positions abroad. American middle-class loses bigly either way.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Good. I hope he does it. Don’t let any of his yes-men or cronies tell him what a horrible idea it is. Let the whole fucking country burn.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Where so you think American farmers buy their fertilizer? Where they sell most of their soy and corn sell to? Maaaaany companies are either buying or selling to/from China. Many will go bankrupt, bany will struggle.

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      China is strengthening ties with Russia to replace u.s trade, and it shows that Putin is laughing his ass off at how he played a whole country, other than his I mean

  • kaugman@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Isn’t thwre a single one RISC-V capable production line in the US? Imagine if Apple starts their own chip production.

    • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There’s a reason TSMC does most of the world’s chip fabrication.

      It’s complex and extremely expensive. Standing up a fab, in America no less, capable of handling Apple’s demand would be an astronomically expensive feat. Apple would never do this while TSMC is still an option. Even after the tariffs it would still probably be cheaper to use TSMC.

      • Fillicia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Also let’s be honest, unless the tariff is applied to everyone it’s gonna be cheaper to use another country as a middleman to trade with with China.

  • DevopsPalmer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    As someone who works for a large US-based company, we are locking in large contracts ASAP for compute power to hopefully keep us sated and avoid these from being an extinction event. We were already discussing some vendors not offering supply contracts already because they see the writing on the wall for their own profit margins

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Fuck.

    It hasn’t even started yet and I know that I have 4 more years of this stupidity news ever single day

    Oh wait

    Since Trump will install himself as a dictator, then die, we have a few decades of couche fucker Vance to look forward to, yeeeiii

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m not convinced we’ll go even a single decade of this regime without total socioeconomic collapse.

      • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The Hitler lasted from July 1932, and Hitler killed himself in April 1945 - 13 years.

        Mussolini lasted from 1922 to his execution in 1945 - 23 years.

        Stalin lasted 1924-1953 - 29 years.

        Fascism inevitably implodes and crates untold suffering along the way, but you might have longer than you think.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Can someone please explain to me why he STILL doesn’t have any understanding of how tarrifs work?

    • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      You’re making the mistake in that his intention is to improve things.

      He doesn’t have to make things better, he just has to say he has made them better. That’s all he’s ever done and it’s worked.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      15 hours ago

      A candidate that expressed nuanced understanding of economic principles would have been less likely to win the election.

      A candidate that instead promises answers that intuitively sound right. If imports are expensive, then obviously the big business owners will build domestic and give us more money. If you get rid of immigrants, then the business owners will have to pay more for citizen workers. Simple answers that are easier for people to believe in.

      Attempts to explain nuance? That ranges from nerds overcomplicating things and/or those darned liberal elites trying to truck them.

      This cuts both ways. In 2020 Biden won not due to a more sophisticated understanding of things, but simply because things were bad, and the other guy therefore was the obvious choice. So to overcome an incumbent, you just have to have people believe stuff is bad, and provide some believable explanation that you could fix it.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      he STILL doesn’t have any understanding of how tarrifs work?

      How do you STILL think this isn’t all intentional? They know what they’re doing. They don’t care if we can afford it or not. This is about the conservatives’ bottom line, lol. They don’t care about you, America, China or whether any of it works.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It doesn’t do anything for their bottom life because the tariff is something we pay TO CHINA

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          A tariff is what you pay to the government of the port of call to get the item you shipped.

          When you pay $1000 for a DJI drone and it get’s to Seattle the US government says “pay us $600 or it goes back on the boat.”

          The Chinese company sees literally zero impact other than possibly less orders and probably a wave of refused merch. Which they might keep some or all of the purchase price of anyway.

        • Pandemanium@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Russia wants to pit the US and China against each other to distract and destabilize them both. So all of this is great for Russia’s bottom line.

        • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          The tariffs got them elected. The fallout of them is a write-off and not their problem. They were the means to an end for votes and swaying opinions and they did their job.

    • rdrunner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I believe that he does, and he knows shit will cost more, but he ALSO knows that his followers have no clue whatsoever. So prices will increase, and he’ll blame it on one of their many “others”. Keeping them scared and mad is the key to their control over them

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Some people want more expensive shit as long as its made in america or with american goods. Thats the point of a tariff.

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        But not the idiots that said inflation was their main issue. Trump told them 3 ways he’s going to economically hurt them 1. Tariffs 2. Raising taxes (unless you are 1%) and 3. Mass Deportation.

  • jaxxed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Trump’s not going to need to apply tarifs.

    Biden has both Russia and China on the back foot with failing economies, and significant social unrest. Both are desperate to make a deal with Trump. Trump only succeeds in negotiation when he can bully his adversary.

    If Biden had the faculties, he could have whipped both countries and probably avoided this mess.

    • auzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Trump whipped Mexico really well into paying for that wall.

      Trump just talks a bunch of shit lol. That’s actually why he won. Because he promised everything to everyone. He doesn’t have any real plans other than those related to genitals and immigrants. He never backs it up with any evidence either

      Trump negotiated really well with Foxconn too. Remember that 10 billion factory they were gonna build thanks to Trump?

      In fact, I’m actually willing to bet petrol prices and power prices will increase too. Because suddenly, batteries and solar have less competition and even if manufacturered in US, they can raise their prices

      It’s just really dumb 😂