• david@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I never said it’s lower quality. Not once.

    No? This you?

    we kept everything to a certain standard of quality. Vertical videos are not suitable for anything except a phone.

    Totally not lower quality. Definitely not. There’s a full stop and everything. No link whatsoever. My bad.

    No one said anything about websites.

    Well I think the rest of us are discussing a video on bbc.co.uk, which is a website, and we’re doing it on lemmy.world, which is also a website, and when I complained about people making portrait videos landscape, I suspect most people correctly figured out that I meant on websites, so I really think it’s just you that assumes we’re talking about jeep club.

    • kajdav@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s such a shitty experience if content can only be consumed on certain platforms, which is what it sounds like you’re proposing.

      Watching portrait footage on a TV sucks, dude.

      • david@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But the fuzzy bars on the side make it great?!?

        Watching portrait footage that’s been padded out to landscape on a portrait device is even worse!

        I’m proposing that the web designer writes a responsive webpage when they are sent a portrait video to include, so that if it’s viewed on a portrait device it fills the width, and when it’s viewed on a landscape device it fills the height. If it’s actually for telly, there’s usually no harm in cropping a bit at the top and bottom and at that point, feel free to put whatever you like down the sides, but there’s no need to throw away the portrait original for the portrait view of the website.

        Like I already said, the technology for writing a webpage that looks different depending on the orientation of the device being used to view it is neither complicated nor new. There’s no need to treat every medium the same in 2023.

        • CeeBee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like I already said, the technology for writing a webpage

          And yet most videos on websites are still proper horizontal. You can maximize and turn your phone. Everyone wins.

          • david@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, and that’s great, it really is, but when the footage you have is portrait, don’t pad it out to force landscape orientation on it irrespective of the orientation of the viewer’s screen, just let portrait content be full size portrait when viewed on a portrait screen. That is the beginning, the middle and the end of my point. It’s all I’m asking for.

              • david@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                And when anyone films in portrait, make sure to punish anyone trying to watch the footage with a similarly criminal portrait orientation, by putting borders round the side of the portrait content to force it to be landscape, thus shrinking the content to roughly a ninth of their screen, unless they switch to the blessed landscape orientation when it will fill a glorious third of the screen. Let no one watch it full size for the creator thereof has sinned against the gods of landscape.

                This is the right and proper punishment for content creators who break the landscape law: let no one see this video fullscreen, for they have sinned against landscape. https://ibb.co/x2MQQG2 let the borders of landscape wrath descend and pad, and let fullscreen be disabled for all, for if landscape viewers are denied fullscreen EVERYONE MUST SUFFER.

                Oh, or you could just skip the fuzzy bars in portrait mode if you’re feeling more accommodating to phone users.