• 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ahh, so the only thing saving us from a corporate dominated future is laws…

    Well I’m an American, I’m sure if they wanted, they could always make a EU version and US version. I’m a bit worried for the future.

    Edit: Spelling

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Android is open source, and there are many forks of it already. If they were to try this, those of us who care would just run a fork of Android.

      • Jeff Van Gundy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Assuming that there will be phones with unlockable bootloaders sold in the US in the future. There are precious few of them now. Importing’s always an option (and quite easy these days), but then you run into the problem of band support.

      • lightsecond@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Burning a new ROM is just as hard fora regular user as jailbreaking an iPhone, so practically it doesn’t make a difference if android is open-source or not.

        Also, even though core android is OSS, what you and i run on our phones heavily depends on the play framework which is Google proprietary. Amazon has tried and failed to fork android before with its fire devices and that hasn’t worked.

        • bug@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          FYI GrapheneOS is trivial to install (you don’t need to do all that exploit and root nonsense you used to have to!) and runs entirely without Google Play Services (unless you want to install them in a less-invasive way, which is also officially supported)

          • lightsecond@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks, bug. It’s gotten better for those of us with some background, but I’d definitely not say it’s trivial for a regular android user to use. GrapheneOS only supports Google Pixels launched after August 2020 for starters. The recommended easy way to install GrapheneOS still needs you to OEM unlock and may need a factory reset as well. Jailbreaking might technically be harder, but this is hard enough.

            The only way something like this can become mainstream is if popular smartphone manufacturers intentionally supported an alternative distribution (like GrapheneOS), which i don’t see happening for business reasons including the possibility of a fallout with Google.

            Even though android is open-source, the hurdles for running an alternative are around the proprietary stuff we depend on in the ecosystem.

            • bug@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’d say having a Pixel is the only real blocker, as unlocking the bootloader and factory resetting the phone are both a couple of clicks in the settings that anyone can follow. I remember the days of rooting and installing cyanogenmod on early Android phones and compared to that the process today is really trivial!

              • lightsecond@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re glossing over a lot of complexity that the GrapheneOS team is doing for you. The reason that they only support Pixels is because Google is relatively open. Their FAQ says the following:

                In most cases, substantial work beyond that will be needed to bring the support up to the same standards. For most devices, the hardware and firmware will prevent providing a reasonably secure device, regardless of the work put into device support. … Broader device support can only happen after the community (companies, organizations and individuals) steps up to make substantial, ongoing contributions to making the existing device support sustainable.

                You can’t expect Android users to be able to en masse move to a fork if Google decides to close the tap.

                I have LineageOS (CyanogenMod) running on one of my spare phones and it is easier now than it used to be ten years ago (speaking from experience), but you still need to have a phone that is supported, and the OEM needs to allow unlocking. I had to wait a couple of weeks to be able to unlock. So it’s definitely not trivial.

                • bug@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re glossing over a lot of complexity that the GrapheneOS team is doing for you

                  Not meaning to gloss over, it’s their hard work that makes it a nice experience! It’s always been the case that some devices are more moddable than others, comparing the ones that are simplest is the only comparison that really makes sense though.

                  As for users moving en masse it obviously wouldn’t be trivial, but the theoretical removal of side-loading wouldn’t happen overnight so there would hopefully be plenty of time for more solutions to pop up.

    • gelberhut@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      EU laws (btw, afaik, India has similar requirement now) is one of the reasons which will make disabling alternative installation option very complicated if Google would want to.

      I do not think it will want to do this, though.