• Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Data encryption and decryption without entering a password is a pretty darn good reason.

    • ArcticAmphibian@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sure, but does a grandmother’s Solitaire & Facebook PC really need quick encrypting and decrypting? Anyone not dealing with sensitive info doesn’t need one.

      • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s no downside to having it. There’s many downsides to not having it. This seems pretty cut and dry to me.

        • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          There’s no downside to having it.

          Sure there are. If it gets compromised with malicious code, I have no way of removing it.

          I can protect ring 0. I can keep crap out of ring 0. If all else fails, I can nuke everything in ring 0 and boot a fresh OS installation. But I can’t do a single bleeping thing except throw out the whole machine if malware takes over ring -1.

        • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          How would at-rest encryption make it less likely that your computer joins a botnet, or more likely that you’d notice if it did?