The new MV3 architecture reflects Google’s avowed desire to make browser extensions more performant, private, and secure. But the internet giant’s attempt to do so has been bitterly contested by makers of privacy-protecting and content-blocking extensions, who have argued that the Chocolate Factory’s new software architecture will lead to less effective privacy and content-filtering extensions.

For users of uBlock Origin, which runs on Manifest V2, “options” means using the less capable uBlock Origin Lite, which supports Manifest V3.

  • Swarfega@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I still prefer Chrome over Firefox but I’ve been running Firefox for over a year now and won’t go back to Chrome because fuck Google. Also stopped using Google for searching and not being tracked is very very noticeable.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Tried using chromium based browser instead? You are not mainlined into Google that way. Vivaldi is absolutely great. It’s got way better baked in features than chrome which can reduce need for extensions and it has a strong commitment to pushing chromium as far as possible to be privacy conscious. Runs and syncs across Android and pc as well.

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Those are all chromium based. They all are connected to google and will all have the manifest v3 change.
        That is unless they will support v3 but keep some doors open for content blockers ( this is mozillas plan )

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes all chromium based browsers are chromium based. What do you mean by they are connected to Google? Yes Google provides the chromium code, but my Vivaldi browser isn’t connecting to Google servers or sending them anything

          • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            What i meant is that chromium is owned and managed by google. If chromium ( and therefor all chromium based browsers ) gets a change, they all do by default. Things like vivaldi or brave will get this change unless they specifically implement ways around it, which i dont think they will.
            Though its way less than chrome, chromium still has links with google and has been found to ping google once in a while even though youre not using google.

            To be accurate, chrome in itself is a chromium based browser. Its chromium with google stuff slapped onto it.

            Its because of this that i find the “but im using [chromium based browser here], so i wont be affected by change x” a false one, because they will.

              • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                I am corrected, thanks :) Im legit surprised they did anything towards the issue, so thanks for pointing it out.
                That said, ad blocking is only a part of the problem and there are a lot of extensions that work on content loading in browsers that are going to be invalidated with the chromium update that an integrated ad blocking feature ( that i hope you can customise to your hearts content ) will not fix…

  • TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Google is such a greedy group of jackasses. Using their browser monopoly to shore up their ad monopoly should be a crime.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      yeah the solution here is so simple, yet most people seem allergic to firefox.

      • Cold_Brew_Enema@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have serious video playing issues on Firefox. I thought it was ublock, so i tried turning it off but video and live streams still take forever to load they freeze, too. My computer is very powerful so that’s not the issue. No idea what is.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I don’t on mobile because it’s way too slow.

        But I guess that isn’t applicable to this post because mobile Chromium doesn’t have ublock anyway…

        And on linux, I have firefox issues with wayland because of some Nvidia thing. Chromium too, but its less severe and I can actually get GPU acceleration working.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          How is Firefox slow? What exactly are you using Firefox for on mobile? These are honest question, I don’t understand.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            An old Snapdragon 845 phone, lol. A razer phone 2.

            It just feels sluggish. Pages render slower, especially larger ones, and it eats more battery, especially with extensions like adblockers running.

            It’s especially apparent because the RP2 is like the oldest 120hz phone. Bromite (aka chromium) feels like butter in comparison.

            • ayaya@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Same story for me on a OnePlus 5T which is the even older Snapdragon 835. Firefox is genuinely unusable. I tried Mull and Iceraven too. For several months I tried to put up with it, but they were all a slow and buggy mess. Switched to Brave and it works fine.

              I use Librewolf on my desktop for the record.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        it wasn’t marketing wank. it was a significant performance difference. people forget Firefox 3.x but i remember. it was fireslug more like.

  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Guess, I will need to stop using Chrome unless I have no other option (I mostly use Firefox, but I occasionally use Chrome).

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Going to plug Cromite (a continuation of Bromite) for a great Chromium fork with built in adblocking, and no nonsense like Brave or whatever: https://github.com/uazo/cromite

    Also great on Android (which it was originally developed for).

    Forks maintained by a hero dev are less than ideal (and not sustainable TBH), but this is where we are…

    • a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Does Cromite have support for auto-filling from 3rd party password managers? When I last used Bromite, it couldn’t so I never ended up using it as my main browser