You are the only one wasting time by giving dumbass avoidance advice instead of telling us what you know.

… What insider information do you have and why do you want to keep us ignorant???

The question was, “why is this a technical limitation?” Not, “what should I do to work around the limitation?”.

Literally not what people are talking about. It’s the “AI” part of the task that doesn’t leave the device (unless it prompts to ask chat gpt). Not that it can magically gleam live info without making any request to the web…

Jeeze, fucking… get your shit straight, making me defend Apple… Fucking do better.

"All of them. Ideally.

… Oh shit, I said that second part oht loud, didn’t I?"

• Every “AI” CEO ever…

No, that’s NOT begging the question, that’s just being an ass about actually asking a question.

Being hostile to a real question’s answers is also not begging the question.

Begging the question is a logical fallacy where someone is purposefully leaving out info or otherwise twisting things to end at a conclusion that was never properly supported. The point is there is an unsupported conclusion they’re trying to jump to.

Simply asking a question, even one with an obvious or sarcastic answer, is seldom “begging the question”.

Uhhhhh it’s an OPEN question available to people who DO dislike the OS, so no. No just ASKING a question is NOT “begging the question”.

It’s asking a question.

Would that produce the black splotches? Would they peel easily? I also like the look, but if parts of it are indicative of bad adhesion… ehhh…

nono, think stupider, then it won’t make literal sense but speak profoundly to you about motivation.

The part that really scares me aren’t the loons disconnected from reality, but the normal people who cannot believe that there are such stupid people in the world.

Just constantly and for ever going around thinking, “I can fix them if I tell them Y!”. No. No you cannot. They are idiots emotionally vested in NOT believing reality. You cannot fix them by reminding them of what they’re actively ignoring…

and dramatizing someone having an opinion you don’t agree with isn’t also negative pressure?

No need to dramatize someone that wasn’t being dramatic, just mildly disagreeable, and on something you seem to obstensibly agree with on principle too…

Almost certainly not by sound, but creating a seal in an ear canal can make it significantly easier to rupture an ear drum. Even a slap up side the head can rupture an ear drum if you get a good seal to their ear before all the trapped air gets crushed. Remarkably easy if it’s the second time, I’d know! 20% hearing loss sucks.

Giving him the benefit of the doubt, maybe the alert startled him and he slapped his ear in surprise trying to dig it out. Or maybe stacked on an injury. Or he could always be a weirdo with thin membranes. We’re not all clones!

I’m not accusing you. I’m stating a fact that I included myself in… You are indeed a dim bulb in the pack.

You and I don’t have to imagine that, dummy. We’ve already done it.

No, the problem is with APPLE’S IMPLEMENTATION of HOW Apple allows third party stores through Safari. NOT with third party browsers themselves. Please learn to read.

Well that’s just Apple “innovation”. You’re clearly not brilliant enough to understand the long term plan of greedy morons Apple.

I’d argue the problem isn’t “browsers”, but Apple’s closed ecosystem clashing with a more secured internet. They do not need to do it this way, which makes it their fault.

That’s not what’s said in the article. At all. What so ever.

The problem isn’t suddenly allowing third party browsers. It’s that Apple’s implementation to allow that in Safari sends out info about sites visited with those app stores. It allows snooping of what 3rd party things people use.

The only problem the Luddites had is they went and busted the machines instead of the rich owners’ kneecaps.

If you say, “they did that too!” Well, NOT ENOUGH!!

You realize most people ONLY wipe when they poop, …right?