15’000/15’000 65 chf/month (~70$/month). No cap. Native IPv6 (with static IP subnet and reverse DNS if you want), Free IPTV on multicast. With a bit of extra you can have Static IPv4 or even the ability to run your own Autonomous System and have BGP at home.
Here in Zurich/Switzerland.
But there aren’t consumer router that can handle this speed so I need to have a workstation on 24/7 for routing that </first world problems>
VSCode + Foam + gitea (+ hexcalidraw if you want to draw)
And this is one of the many reasons that these days I create a @duck.com email address for each website.
My password manager (Bitwarden) happily generates for me both the mail and the password… now instead of having to look up for the unique password for each website I need to look for both the unique password and unique email 🤷
Furthermore if they are incompetent enough to make shitty regexp they are for sure incompetent to keep their db safe from hacking/leaking… and I am fine with a duck.com address being locked, less so with my actual email address
Given I am an hacker I can tell from this image that the IP address of this mainframe is 365.127.42.555
The question is not what Google does now but what it will do in 1month, 1quarter, 1year.
It has been years that more and more petty measures have been taken.
FWIW I would make a spare account
FWIW I use foam. It is a visual code extension so you piggyback on all Visual code features and extensions (e.g. git, md lint, etc). And I sync with my self hosted gitea. It doesn’t have a mobile app but I use obsidian with the obsidian git plugin
Congrats! You are on the car of a rollercoaster about to start.
It’s going to be awesome, it’s going to be messy, there is no way back and no way down.
A couple of sure things:
Enjoy the journey and these moments in particular 😃
I don’t use windows for close to 20 years so I didn’t need ntfsclone so far but do I read correctly the man page that only the source is specified as positional parameter? If so, shouldn’t you have to write
nftsclone —overwrite /dev/sdc /dev/sdb? It still can be misleading (given that mv uses two positional parameters so mv -f source destination would have done what you wanted) but a bit less cryptic?