Not NASA, Nasa.
Not NASA, Nasa.
Placement of the shark’s eyes makes me question Larson’s qualifications as a marine biologist.
If you’re registered at those other instances, you can create another profile(s) in Jerboa that connects to them, and then using that profile, browse by Local, I suppose.
I’m registered at both lemmy.cafe and lemmy.ca, and have profiles for both registrations in Jerboa.
Otherwise, if you’re registered only with Beehaw, I believe the answer is, “no, not in Jerboa, just with your device’s normal web browser.”
Garbage ad-laden filler puff-piece.
Article ends with:
There was no independent verification of the surgeon’s claims.
The internet tells me that “plant growth requirements” are air, water, nutrients, space, and light.
Let’s imagine. The growing plant was found in a lung. It must have:
Air. Plants ingest carbon dioxide, exude oxygen. Both gasses are present in our own respiration. So that checks out.
Water. I guess water was leeched from the lungs’ blood supply, since we’re all just bags of mostly water.
Nutrients. See water, above. If the mamallian reproduction system can supply a growing embryo with required nutrients, why not those required by a fir sapling? Sure, they’re different requirements, but press on.
Space. Assuming that no other competing species of plant is growing in the lung, this isn’t a problematic issue.
Light. Ah, well. Photosynthesis requires sunlight, and I am reminded of a joke attributed to Groucho Marx, Abraham Lincoln, Nicola Tesla, and Albert Einstein:
Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog, it’s too dark to read, or to cultivate horticulture.
I am as dubious of this fir sapling story as my quoted joke’s provenance.
From the app’s Home page:
Are you replying to/commenting on the OP’s title? Did you not read past its first sentence, into its second, mentioning the plane?