I’m really confused… Did you answer my question?
I’m really confused… Did you answer my question?
If you buy a derelict house(that no human can possibly live in) and fix it up to a decent standard with the intent to sell it, are you still a piece of shit?
Peace with no occupation would be ideal.
Best part of Gondwana
The old ‘let perfection be the enemy of good’ argument…
Surely this is a step in the right direction?
I guess you gotta celebrate the wins when you can no matter how messed up the situation is! :)
I know this isn’t the core of the story but I’m kinda proud of my country (The UK) for not fucking this up.
I think the UK Justice system did it’s job here, albeit keeping him detained for a lengthy duration to do it.
That’s how I play the game, you get on first name basis with people too that way…
Isn’t heated tho :P
Lawnmaster L10
They don’t “all” have to be connected, the vast majority of available global models aren’t (IE a lot of the affordable Indian/Chinese models).
The vast majority of models sold in the USA are IE Tesla. More affordable models like the Renault Zoe afaik aren’t but I’m not sure how accessible these are in the USA. I’m not sure about the Chevvy Volt tbh… Consumers can purchase to buy a non-connected vehicle.
Out of the EVs I have I mostly use the one that is connected so I can do automations to turn on climate control etc. Connectivity is a convenience/safety thing for me and I assume others…
Agreed, but specifically an aftermarket electric seat bidet to save in a load of plumbing.
I asked them to check it(the privacy URL) and validate it wasn’t user error and they accused me of “wasting their time”…
No need to apologize, I’m just trying to get clarity if I’m right to call them out or not…
I have one option at 30 euros (this) and another at 60 euros (movistar).
There are others but they have a terrible reputation.
Given that the privacy policy is linked from the contract, can I assume that they will just say “you need to refer to the URL in the contract” and as that URL is non-existent I’m basically not able to protect my rights or does it work the other way?
In the privacy policy it states “We may share information with our business partners to offer you certain products, services or promotions”, it doesn’t explicitly state who they are…
He was my local (Bradford) MP and he was absolutely useless. The main has a fragile ego and is totally dedicated to himself. He is an opportunist politician and Rochdale will suffer for it.
I’m sorry Rochdale, it’s going to be a rough few years…
Whenever I hear of MTG I think of the Japanese firm and I’m really confused why the business has been assigned a gender -_-
I help maintain Etherpad and this cuts so deep.
The main counter-argument I have is restrictive installation policies especially in Edu/bluechip IE you can do whatever the fuck you want in the sandbox that is your web browser but if you want to install some software you have to wait 4 weeks for approval then another 4 weeks to get approval for each update.
Also security updates/patches for native applications can be really shitty especially on Microsoft inflicted devices… For example, if you want to update Inkscape on Windows you have to do a whole download/install process. This can lead to security related issues…
Can we not make Lemmy all about divisive American politics please? :)
Google ran a huge push to get these into schools too… There was a LOT of pressure on Schools to adopt from various partners (or at least that happened in the UK)…
Google is aware of the Microsoft gains from getting people used to their products at a young age…