• Plume (She/Her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    People. We, the French, pulled a left-wing coalition out of our asses in less than a week and managed to “win” an election. You have months. Hope is permitted.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well spoken.

      A few months in politics is an eternity. Yes, things are chaotic right now, but this is short term. We can unify after this. And we can win.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      A “long” election campaign in the UK is 6 weeks. In 1992 they had one that was just 30 days.

      Months is plenty of time, especially in the modern world. Maybe 250 years ago it was necessary to campaign for months on end so that the candidate could personally travel by train to every state. But, with modern media (both traditional and social), there’s no real reason for campaigns to be as long as they are. The only reason they’re this long is that the thought is that the earlier you start campaigning, the better. So, each side keeps starting earlier and earlier, making it effectively into a neverending campaign cycle.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s very true. We’ve been brainwashed into a year long campaign mostly because it generates a lot of money for various parties but prior elections have proven it’s mostly what happens in the last month that makes a difference.

      Y’all are lucky you can make coalitions, though. This is more akin to your election if you only had centrists and far right running. Two party system and all that.

      • Magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Because we only have a relative majority and now Macron is teaming up with the hard right (not the far right, the other right right that is not center right… Yeah, too much right is wrong) to deprive us of any path to government. Shit sucks. But it could have sucked way harder.

        • Pronell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s also a strategic moderate move to keep the hard right from merging with Reform.

          I’m hoping the left wing parties aren’t locked out and still able to get progress made.

          • Ooops@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Cuddling up to the hard right might look like a strategical move but it never works. Normalising them only shifts the discussion further to the right. And let’s face it… in this post-factual time where all that matters is the narratives, giving them a platform will only help to brain-wash more people into believing right-wing fake-solutions to actual problems.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You, the French, have not been the target of a 40 year war against public education by the right wing. Americans are on average significantly less capable of rational thought because of it. Source: I am an American raised in the crippled education system I mentioned before.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s a bit naive to think Western Europe hasn’t been under attack from the right wing at least as long as the US has. They’ve had wars over it that never really reached US shores, and it never really went away. All of the strategies that have been used in the US were piloted and honed in Europe – look up the activities there by Manafort, Stone, Bannon, etc. all the same names who have been implementing the shit you’re seeing in the US were active in Western and Eastern Europe years before this. It’s been going on there far longer.

        It’s amazing to me that people in the US haven’t been paying attention to what’s gone on there and learning from their successes.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      We don’t really do coalitions here. Our voting system doesn’t allow for it.

      It does happen within Congress itself though, when different sects of the two parties cross the aisle to join with the other party on certain issues. But since Congress doesn’t elect a prime minister, it doesn’t happen for the presidency.

      • Plume (She/Her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I know. You’re missing my point. :)

        My point wasn’t the coalition. My point was that we had 21 days to cobble something together and not only did we do it, we managed to win with it. It’s not about the coalition, it’s about building a campaign. You have months to do so.

        And you’re about to say that Trump had way longer to do so. Yes. So did the far right in our country, which barely even campaigned because all of the media were doing so on their behalf for the last two years and we still managed to outnumber them.

        Trust me, my faith in the Democrats is barely existent. But still, I think it can be done.