• FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Man the english language makes no sense.

    the sound in lose is the same sound as we are taught “oo” makes.

    Couldn’t a more straightforward language be chosen as the global one ffs

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      My father (who had a PhD in English) used to tell me that “ghoti” was pronounced “fish”

      GH as in rouGH
      O as in wOmen
      TI as in raTIon

      • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That isn’t really consistent with English orthography.

        But you can write “pfysche”, and that would be consistent with English.

        • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Ooh, also its accent, this is not a thing couplet for me

          Discount, viscount, load and broad,
          Toward, to forward, to reward,

          Nor it’s immediate predecessor,

          Banquet is not nearly parquet,
          Which exactly rhymes with khaki.

          Parquet isn’t in my vocabulary, but doesn’t seem to rhyme with khaki in any common dialect either way.

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      There’s also loose and they sound the same but mean different things.

      Loose is when your pants is too wide.

      Lose is when the pants were so wide that you lost them.

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Interesting, I didn’t know that. FYI, there’s the phonetic transcription that saves us from using other words to describe a pronunciation.

          luːz - lose

          luːs - loose