silence7@slrpnk.net to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoChemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkChemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’www.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.net to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square7fedilinkfile-text
In practice, this means 3M is continuing to create harm from the risks they spent decades covering up
minus-squareceiphas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoBut the rich can avoid the tap water…
minus-squareCocodapuf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoNo they can’t. Do you know where fancy spring water brands get their water? The fucking tap, that’s where.
minus-squareP1nkman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoWrong. The rich uses lab-grown water, clean from all the chemicals!
minus-squareMaeve@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·5 months agoReverse osmosis, which wastes a lot.
But the rich can avoid the tap water…
No they can’t. Do you know where fancy spring water brands get their water? The fucking tap, that’s where.
Wrong. The rich uses lab-grown water, clean from all the chemicals!
Reverse osmosis, which wastes a lot.