• agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    Shortsighted, idealistic, accelerationist nonsense. You fell for KGB propaganda. How many members of the working class need to suffer and die to bring about that collapse? Accelerationists never think about the cost, or assume they won’t be one of the ones to suffer.

    • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You fell for KGB propaganda.

      You liberals are now indistinguishable from the looniest right wing fascist conspiracy theorist. There is zero distance between you and the guy blaming everything on the “Judaeo-Bulshervik conspiracy”.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        Then stop proving me right.

        Not a liberal. Anarcho-Communist. But I’m also not an idiot. Praxis praxis praxis. You have none, only idealism.

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          What’s the praxis here? I think the word you’re looking for here is “pragmatism”; those aren’t the same things.

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I am aware. Praxis is the synthesis of theory and action, as distinct from pure idealism divorced from any actual action. Pragmatism is a guiding principle in choosing what actions to take, prioritizing behavior that has tangible results over fruitless ones.

            I can see why you would think I’m conflating the two since I am advocating praxis specifically founded on pragmatism. However, I’m also generally advocating any form of praxis, pragmatic or not, over just empty both-sides complaining.

        • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          But I’m also not an idiot.

          removed, you think the USSR still exists, you’re dumb as a bag of hammers.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Right because 1. ex-KGB Putin totally isn’t keeping the dream alive and well 2. acknowledging the very real and proven influence of Russian state-sponsored troll farms has anything to do with the CIA 3. that’s definitely how logic works. You don’t have to be a US propaganda shill to recognize a Russian propaganda shill. Cosplay Leftists decomposing everything into a fictitious ideological dichotomy is exactly what the capitalist oligarchs want.

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I don’t think communism is evil, I am a Communist. China is not Russia is not Communist. They couldn’t possibly be Communist, since communism is by definition moneyless and stateless, and both China and Russia are states that have money. China and Russia are both capitalist countries with varying degrees of state involvement and oligarchy. Suggesting that either country is Communist is a bad script.

              • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Communism is defined as a stateless, classless, moneyless society; broadly speaking, a society in which private property is abolished. Neither China nor Russia has abolished private property, and in fact both countries are home to many billionaires.

                What definition were you using, and how is it in any way applicable to modern China or Russia?