• ArcticAmphibian@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    But with a reason, I’m sure. There’s no reason for the everyday consumer to need one, other than Microsoft wanting more control.

    • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Data encryption and decryption without entering a password is a pretty darn good reason.

      • ArcticAmphibian@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Sure, but does a grandmother’s Solitaire & Facebook PC really need quick encrypting and decrypting? Anyone not dealing with sensitive info doesn’t need one.

          • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            How would at-rest encryption make it less likely that your computer joins a botnet, or more likely that you’d notice if it did?

        • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          There’s no downside to having it. There’s many downsides to not having it. This seems pretty cut and dry to me.

          • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            There’s no downside to having it.

            Sure there are. If it gets compromised with malicious code, I have no way of removing it.

            I can protect ring 0. I can keep crap out of ring 0. If all else fails, I can nuke everything in ring 0 and boot a fresh OS installation. But I can’t do a single bleeping thing except throw out the whole machine if malware takes over ring -1.