• tranxuanthang@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hopefully I don’t get many downvotes for this, but it isns’t necessary to deny anything related to AI and bombard Mozilla for this. Sure, Copilot is a disaster, because it is a service and will call home to M$ and collect your data. But all of what Mozilla offers us is on-device AI, which is exceptional. I’ve been waiting so long for on-device AI-based webpage translation, so people don’t need to rely on external services like Google or Bing to translate any more.

    • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Same, their local translation tech is absolutely great! If they keep working “AI” features that are pretty much quality of life ML stuff I’m all in for it.

      • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s fun playing with local AI stuff. I’ve been playing with piper-tts and it’s fast on a modern system.

  • Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    We are approaching the use of AI in Firefox — which many, many of you have been asking about

    Which one of you was it, who asked for AI in Firefox???

    • marcie (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      AI actually can be very good at translating things locally while keeping tone and intent, and thats what mozilla mentions here. I’m fully down with AI powered local translation tools native to firefox, it’ll put it way above the competition

      Some LLMs are low enough in resource usage to do this on weak and older PCs

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Pretty please, fuck off with the AI. It’s really not something I need from a browser, don’t inflate your download size for a screen reader, just MAKE IT OPTIONAL in every way.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      You sound like you have no disabilities that make it hard for you to use the Internet. Good for you.

      If AI can add usability features that help people use the Internet easier then that’s a good thing. You don’t need to use it. Why complain about software being capable of helping others?

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    We are approaching the use of AI in Firefox — which many, many of you have been asking about — in the same way. We’re focused on giving you AI features that solve tangible problems, respect your privacy, and give you real choice.

    We’re looking at how we can use local, on-device AI models — i.e., more private — to enhance your browsing experience further. One feature we’re starting with next quarter is AI-generated alt-text for images inserted into PDFs, which makes it more accessible to visually impaired users and people with learning disabilities.

    NO! I don’t want AI in my Firefox. If Mozilla really adds AI, I will consider switching my main browser since Firefox 1 came out.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      AI generated alt-text running locally is actually a fantastic accessibility feature. It’s reliable, it provides a service, it can absolutely be deployed securely.

      It’s fine to be critical of technology, it’s not fine to become as irrational about it as the tech bros trying to make a buck.

      • MrSoup@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Plus I think there will be a way to disable it (like with local translation we have rn).

    • joojmachine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Good luck convincing people to switch to it based only on “it loads pages faster than Chrome” though. It’s a good goal to have, but getting tunnel-visioned on it when their current speed in real world use is pretty comparable is definitely not a good long-term plan.

      • NostraDavid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Soon, Firefox can block ads better than Chrome. Ads are annoying. I see Chrome losing at least a 5% of the market, if not more, to Firefox, just because they’re going to break uBlock Origin, and Firefox isn’t.

      • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Backdrop-filter blur with css animations and box-shadows. Lots of flickering, weird artifacts.

        It’s also got an issue on macOS where a sticky element can’t have a backdrop-filter with a background that has alpha/opacity (#0006)

        CSS transitions are laggy in general in FF Linux

        Works in chrome and safari and FF on windows.