So they got all that money from Uncle Sam’s CHIPS Act only to lay off 10,000 employees and make themselves “lean”. Govt funded unemployment.

  • A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This sort of thing is increasingly making TSMC a monopoly as a fab. Due to the extreme economies of scale, fabbing looks like something that is hard to do well under the capitalist model. Perhaps a good time for some of the larger nations of the world to start publicly owned fabs (that publish their research instead of hoarding it) instead of ending up with the whole world reliant on one company that will eventually be able to name its price.

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They won’t. That’s their springboard into that multi trillion dollar AI market everyone keeps talking about

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        unless some MBA decides that it’s better to sell single purpose expensive ai boards without video output

    • RoosterBoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      “Here is more evidence that our system is fundamentally broken and doesn’t serve the people who make it run anymore”

      You: “How can I profit from this?”

      You sound like a CEO in the making.

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, stock prices do go up after stuff like this. It’s a reliable way to profit.

        The system sucks, but this is literally how rich people turn money into more money, while we complain we don’t have enough.

        I may be a socialist, but I live in a capitalist dystopia, so sometimes I just exploit the system that exists instead of constantly taking the idealistic high road and getting kicked in the teeth for it.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Even Marx dabbled in the equities markets.

          People seem to think having an economic philosophy is the same as having a moral philosophy. Absolutely not. If you look at a system and conclude “This is dysfunctional, it’s leaking money everywhere” that doesn’t preclude you from getting a sponge and mopping some of that money up.

        • KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The problem is fixable in microcode -if- it hasn’t already caused damage to the CPU. Most CPUs are fucked.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It sounds like a workaround, not a fix. And it’s not clear that it stops the processor degradation, rather than just slowing it.

            • zurohki@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              There’s no such thing as stopping processor degradation, it’s just that it usually takes so long that nobody cares anymore.

            • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              And the “fix” (big foam helmet) is not even out yet. They don’t have the chips to replace them all right now and are still selling more. You can help yourself by setting the clock speed (no boost) yourself.

              Oh and after the foam helmet gets put on they will still sell these using the old higher specs.

    • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Chips Act, Take 1: Hey Intel here’s 8 Billion dollars to make us more chips in the US. Intel: I gotta let 15,000 of you go, there’s just not enough money…

    • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thought they would be more tacit about it. This is too obvious and too soon after taking taxpayers’ money. But they probably don’t care anyways. Who is going to stop them or hold them accountable?

    • Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The CHIPS plants just started being built a few months ago. This is bad for the employees and short-term investors, but long-term Intel will be fine and the plants will be a net positive to the country.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is this really a backfire? My read is that they’re actually focusing on their core business (plus cutting down marketing). It sounds like the right move, but maybe I’m too optimistic?

    • Entropywins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t think it backfired…I truly don’t believe the Chips act is a jobs act. It is to address manufacturing gaps in semiconductors within the US. The US government wants semiconductor manufacturers to update foundries and gave them money to do so. The jobs that have been added within the industry have been icing on the cake but not the original intent imho.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    How long before Nvdia buys them, or at least tries to. Nvidia tried to buy Arm but got stopped by the UK government.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Nvidia wants IP. They do not want to buy foundries. It’s too volatile and dependent on government subsidies while also being well outside their core competencies. If their products don’t sell as a fabless company, they don’t see growth and lose on the manufacturing cost. If their products don’t sell and their chip fabs run idle, they lose a shitton of money on not just the above but also the cost of maintaining the fabs.

    • wootz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Arm is worth 5.3bn USD and employs just over 8000 people. Intel is worth just over 100bn USD and employs 124,000 people.

      Nvidia is worth 42bn USD and employs 30,000 people.

      That makes Intel over twice as valuable as Nvidia with over four times as many employees.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Don’t understand your “worth” numbers, that’s generally market cap and those numbers don’t line up. The employee counts line up…

        100B is… close enough for Intel (though they have fallen to 95B). So $730,769 per employee

        ARM is $140B… So $20,000,000 an employee…

        nVidia is worth 2.7T… $90,000,000 an employee…

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nvidia is worth 42bn USD and employs 30,000 people.

        Nvidia’s has a market cap 30x of Intel’s. So it could issue more stock to raise capital for a buyout. It’s not the company equity but the market cap that it needs to have money to purchase. Even a controlling stake of > 50% would give them defacto control. Of course governments & regulators would probably block it or force Nvidia to divest bits of itself, and that’s probably the greatest protection Intel has against such a scenario.

        But if Intel weakens further, it may well be someone else tries to acquire it. I bet a lot of companies would love to snaffle it up. It’s kind of ironic that Intel used to be the big dog in the semiconductor space but even AMD is bigger than it these days and are potentially many others who’d like buy it out. In fact, for all we know Intel might be shedding all these jobs to make it look more attractive to potential buyers.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The thing is that AMD and Nvidia are chip designers not chip makers. While Intel does design and print chips, the reason Intel is so critical (from US perception) is they own the foundries to make chips.

          AMD decided years ago to go fabless, as for Nvidia I’m not sure they want to own the fabrication process.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Boycott Divest Sanction

        It’s not necessarily the thread to bring it up but linkerbaan is on a mission.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because Intel takes American subsidies, so it would be best to keep the money circulating in America by providing jobs to Americans. Not subsidize some Apartheid in the Middle East.

      • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Linkerbaan isn’t capable of any discussion that doesn’t involve Israel, and must involve it in any thread he participates in no matter how irrelevant. This is just what he does.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I wonder how irrelevant Intel is to israel

          Intel Israel is the largest private employer in the Israeli hi-tech

          Also nice false framing and straight up lying about my activity on Lemmy.

  • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So the semiconductor jobs and manufacturing isn’t coming back to the US?

    Who else saw this coming? Because I did.

    I remember telling people that and they wouldn’t believe it. Time has a way of making the unknown known.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s a dude in wallstreetbets who dumped a $700k inheritance into Intel stocks. lol

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, Intel is down 33% over the last two days… didn’t work this time…

        Some layoffs can be seen as “improving efficiency”. This deep of cut is “oh shit, things are screwed”.

        • jacksilver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It has me oddly hopeful. It sounds like they may have finally realized that they can’t ignore their core product/purpose. However, whether it’s too late or if they have the ability to actually execute is still to be seen.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Frankly, no idea. They talked the talk, but it’s vague enough that I wouldn’t be surprised if they cut out some important people and kept a lot of the bogus crap.

            Speaking from a company that has seen (less dramatic) rhetoric around similar circumstances, and everyone on the ground who understood nuance would have guessed certain projects to get canned. Then it turns out they treated the money losing projects as the sacred cows and cut the profitable projects to the bone and put them at risk rather than give up the losers.

    • tmcgh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Dude, what the heck is wrong with people. Wealth is wasted on the stupid.

      • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        its mainly that our modern culture worships money and things whoever has more of it is inherently better.

        So rich people make bad decisions because they think that being rich means they are always right, and that their ideas are special and magical and come from a mystical realm of refined thought only people with stacks of cash possess.

        And when they fail, they blame everything except their greed focused short sightedness.

        • tmcgh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The problem is that it is just poor money management. He could’ve been set for life. Put that into an index or S&P500 and get 10% every year. That’s 70k and he wouldn’t even have to work. If you took that 70k and invested back into the fund, you can double your money in about 7 years, assuming 10% returns.

          • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah I agree. That’s what I would’ve done. You saying that wealth is wasted just made it sound like the money dissapeared somehow. He wasted his chance on financial independence, sure, but that’s not away from the rest of us.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I had a friend in the '90s who took a $40K inheritance and “invested” it all on $75 Fossil watches, the kind with Popeye and other cartoon characters on them. At least she was able to show them off at parties and get all the guests to go home.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Meh, he bought a significant dip, even if it goes lower in the coming months, in a few years he will be way up. It’s not like Intel will go away, they are in a duopoly market.

        Intel has been down from around 50 YTD to 30 likely in a few years it will be back to 50 and he will close to double his money

        Though he could have probably just put the 700K into S&P 500 and have his retirement taken care of, since he is in his 20s

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Holy F, what an idiot nepo baby. Maybe daddy who pays for college works as a VP at intel

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Two generations of bad cpu’s and their solution is get rid of the workers so they can keep their bonuses.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Part of the lackluster CPU problem is that Intel was pissing away their money on other adventures. CPUs were “in the bag”, so they kept spending money on other stuff to try to “create new markets”. Any casual observer knew their fundamental problem was simple: they got screwed on fabrication tech. Then they got screwed again as a lot of heavy lifting went to the ‘GPU’ half of the world and they were the only ones with zero high performance GPU product/credibility. But they instead went very different directions with their investments…

      For example they did a lot to try to make Optane DIMMs happen, up to and including funding a bunch of evangelism to tell people they’ll need to rewrite their software to use entirely new methods of accessing data to make Optane DIMMs actually do any better than NAND+RAM. They had a problem where if it were treated like a disk, it was a little faster, but not really, and if it were used like RAM it was WAY slower, so they had this vision of a whole new third set of data access APIs… The instant they realized they needed the entire software industry to fundamentally change data access from how they’ve been doing it for decades for a product to work should have been the signal to kill it off, but they persisted.

      See also adventures in weird PCIe interconnects no one asked for (notably they liked to show a single NVME drive being moved between servers, which costed way more than just giving each server another NVME and moving data over a traditional fabric). Embedding FPGA into CPUs when they didn’t have the thermal budget to do so and no advantages over a discrete FPGA. Just a whole bunch of random ass hardware and software projects with no connection to business results, regardless of how good or bad they were. Intel is bad for “build it, and they will come”.

  • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What’s crazy to me is that they are laying off more employees than the total number of full time employees I’ve work at for most companies.

    They are laying off 12% of their work force.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s what happens when companies are too fucking big, and intel was essentially a monopoly for a while.

      I have interned at AT&T while at University, laying off a 1000 people would be less than 1 % for them.

      • ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        After seeing this article I went down a rabbit hole and IBM isn’t even in the top 10 US of most employees. Here’s some of the popular ones from the top 30.

        • Walmart - 2.3 Million
        • Amazon - 1.61 Million
        • DHL - 594,000
        • FedEx - 547,000
        • UPS - 536,000
        • Home Depot - 456,000
        • Target - 415,000
        • Kroger - 414,000
        • Marriott - 411,000
        • Starbucks - 381,000
        • Walgreens - 333,000
        • Pepsi - 318,000
        • Costco - 316,000
        • Chase - 309,000
        • Lowes - 300,000
        • IBM - 282,000
        • CVS - 219,000
        • Bank of America - 212,000

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_largest_United_States–based_employers_globally

        • ...m...@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          …i’m surprised to see DHL rank so highly in that list: what’s their domestic market focus, business-to-business freight logistics?..i seldom see DHL packages and when i do they’re almost exclusively of international origin…

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wonder how many of the over 1000 VPs will get canned. You read that right. I worked there at the beginning of my career. I know a lot of people who are now VPs. Only one of them was actually any good. One guy couldn’t even manage his own staff meetings when he was a first line manager. Nice guy, not dumb or anything, but not brilliant, and a terrible organizer.