• rustyricotta@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      I don’t know what everyone else is using, but Revanced works perfectly for me despite the exaggerated claims of its demise.

    • menemen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      I use Greentuber on my phone. Don’t know how to get rid of adds on my fire tb stick.

    • pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      I’ve been using this one for years, which filters out ads and sponsor segments:

      https://newpipe.net/

      Only for Android though. If you use iOS, switch to Android and you’ll also get a really Firefox browser with ublock origin that blocks all the ads compared to that 30something% what every iOS browser does.

      • fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Newpipe is fucking great. Does what I want it to and doesn’t do what I don’t want it to. Favorite thing about it is the ability to easily download video or audio.

  • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    If I’m watching YouTube on my TV, I mute it when anything longer than a 5 second ad comes on. If what I’m watching is less than 10 minutes, I’ll just back out and start in again, usually it will come up without the ad, then seek to where I left off. Although oftentimes lately, I’ll be watching a 5 minute video, and I’ll get 1 minute in and get hit with an unskippable 2 minute ad, I just quit YouTube for the day.

  • Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Put a pi-hole in my rooter filtering all adds of all webs and apps was the best thing I ever did.

  • Sakychu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    Camara zooms out revealing a third guy looking down into his face youtube requiring a Webcam so they can track your eyes

    • pemptago@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      I’m convinced Mark Zuckerberg had a wet dream about pupil tracking when he bought Oculus.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        im convinced his business model if AR/VR ever takes off will involve pupil tracking yes

        • anachronist@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          Most of the tech billionare’s ideas comes from watching a dystopian 80s scifi and saying “let’s do this but where I’m the bad guy.”

          Show me one thing Elon ever came up with that isn’t in Total Recall.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            Show me one thing Elon ever came up with that isn’t in Total Recall.

            Musk is trash, but to be fair, Philip K. Dick pretty much invented like 90% of popular, modern sci-fi tropes.

    • hactar42@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      So I have a conspiracy theory around that. Android used to put the volume slider at the top of the screen. At some point they moved it to the right side, and now blocks the skip button on YouTube. I won’t doubt this was done on purpose, so if you lower the volume for an ad, you will be forced to watch more of it.

  • dgmib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    After going nuclear against ad blockers, at some point google is going to introduce a new “feature” where YouTube uses AI with your phone’s camera to automatically pause videos when you look away from your phone.

    Then they’ll make it so you have to buy a subscription to turn it off during ads.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      I’m to the point that if whatever I’m watching/doing pops an ad at me, I reflexively make a snap judgement on whether I want to continue watching/doing whatever it is. Often the answer is ‘no’ and I’ll just bail entirely.

    • bob_lemon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Basically me every time I open a website on my work laptop, where I cannot add browser extensions because of IT policies.

      I honestly cannot fathom why large companies don’t include at least simple adblockers in their browser configurations. I don’t even need to block youtube ads, the banners on stackoverflow are bass enough). Would probably save fairly significant amounts of bandwidth, too.

  • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I have adblock on my Mac, but not on the PS5. Whenever I watch YouTube on my TV via PS5, I have to open and close videos sometimes 10 or 15 times before they just play the video I’ve clicked on and not some obnoxious 45 second long advert for some bullshit I don’t want and won’t use. Honestly not sure why YouTube finds it so hard to play the video I clicked on and not random other videos. I also tend to stop watching vids as soon as an ad break happens.

    I work with a marketing department full time and they’re exactly as annoying as expected, always pissing about on tiktok or Instagram creating shit that nobody could possibly feasibly care about.

    Is there an alternative to YouTube on PS5 that doesn’t have adverts? Or is there some way to get adblocking on there?

    • Drew Belloc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      I believe you would need a pihole, is like a ad block but in the entire network, so you could even use the official youtube app on a tv and not get any ad

      • reddeadhead@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        I think they serve the ads from the same domain so DNS blocking wont work. And I heard they are testing baking the ads into the actual video.

        • Drew Belloc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          I was using the pihole from my pc back in the day and it did work, but i totally forget about the ad injection on the videos

          • kerf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            Pihole hasn’t made any difference on devices like smart TVs and consoles for years, at least in my experience. It really sucks but they broke me and I bought premium family because we use YouTube a lot on non pc devices and I hate ads so much

  • Miss Millie@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    I remembered a scene of a black mirror episode: if the person looked away the ads will stop until the person watch it again and it’s unavoidable … I wonder if this will be a reality one day

    • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Yes, the technology to do this is here, and they’re just waiting for the consumer to be able to put up with it.

      • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        They know if they do that people will just disable their cameras or put tape over it like they already do. If they make it so you can’t disable the camera without losing functionality then people won’t buy the product.

        If they try to push it by making a gentleman’s agreement with their competitors to make all tvs or phones use camera eye contact during ads well have to have fight back with more ad blockers and such.

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          I mean the concept is pretty simple, all they have to do is make whatever the content it is not play without the verification.

          Now I do have to say, it does come down to what is the system we do want? We can agree we don’t want intrusive ads. We can say that the paid for services are too expensive. But at the end of the day when we refuse to pay for the content, and then bypass the ads, we do leave content creation in a rough spot. We’ve kind of reached a point where we need a new system. Yet all we seem to do is try and find ways to break the existing one.

      • Miss Millie@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        Reading your reply made me think … it’s possible that implying such technology might help rising Free & Open Source culture more … given that FOSS apps are usually ad-free and with no tracking

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Honestly the best thing about FOSS is that money isn’t driving all the decisions. Most open-source projects are built because the dev just wants to build something cool or useful, or they’re trying to solve specific problems. Most individual devs don’t really care if their user count goes up every quarter.
          Personally I’ve been maintaining a chrome extension for about 10 years, and it’s sat happily with about 7000 users that entire time. I built it because I wanted to use it, and I’ve declined several offers to buy the extension and monetize it.

            • xthexder@l.sw0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              It’s an extension that makes GitHub pages full width: https://github.com/xthexder/wide-github/

              Admittedly the usefulness has gone down a little bit in the last couple years now that GitHub themselves have made code diffs and some other things full width by default.

              When I first wrote this I had just gotten a giant 4K display at work and was really annoyed I still had to scroll left and right with the page only covering 1/3 of the screen.

      • emmy67@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        This is why I just set up a media server at home.

        It’s mine, you can’t pump it full of ads. All the media is mine and those companies can go fuck themselves.

        Sail those seas folks

  • Pissnpink@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    26 days ago

    If you click the ad does the company have to pay like a fraction of a cent or something for a click through? Like if I always click on the ads can I make them pay for having waisted my time if it’s only a little bit?

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      you’ll enjoy a fun browser addon then! - adnauseum

      it clicks on every. single. ad both doing what you’re doing, but also poisoning the data Google has on you. From their website:

      As the collected data gathered shows an omnivorous click-stream, user tracking, targeting and surveillance become futile

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        hat’s a cute idea but it completely ignores that it isn’t 2005 anymore. Algorithms are good enough to detect that.

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          eh, on the off chance they aren’t, why not. I don’t see those ads anyway and I do enjoy being a nuisance, even if a minor one

    • I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      That’s the idea behind the AdNauseum browser extension. “Click” on every single ad so that the data becomes worthless and the companies that are advertising have a negative return on investment. But it does mean that the ad server company gets more money.