Share your shave of the day!

  • djundjilaMA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m going to disagree with you and @gcgallant@sub.wetshaving.social about the efficiency.

    I’m curious to hear what you think in 5 or so flights.

    I’m my experience, this puppy has all the toast buttering efficiency one could ask for in a GEM, it’s just more opinionated about the range of angles it lets you use than the MMOC and Clog-Pruf.

    • gcgallant
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have, in fact, referred to the Flying Wing as “mild”. For me, that refers to blade feel and not shaving efficiency. Perhaps that’s improper use of the term on my part. I can get BBS shaves from razors like the Feather AS-D2 and Blutt with the 0.86 plate by paying attention to the “opinion” (nice choice of term there} those razors express about blade angle. I favor the cap side while shaving so a “mild” razor for me is one where I feel the cap restricting the angle. Not a big deal.

      • djundjilaMA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That makes sense to me.

        When you said “mild”, I thought more of something like the Henson: tiny blade gap, no exposure, no way to hurt yourself even if you’re drunk. I don’t know the AS-D2, but the Blutt with the 0.86 goes in that direction, yes.

        • gcgallant
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I thought more of something like the Henson

          I appreciate razor engineering that contributes to, enhances, and responds to good shaving technique. I think the goal at Henson is to provide a device that works the same way whether you have technique or not. There’s no joy in that IMHO.